Tesla C2070 vs GeForce RTX 4060
Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2070 is positioned at rank #287 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060
Why is GeForce RTX 4060 better than Tesla C2070?
Comparing the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB to the Tesla C2070 showcases more than 13 years of staggering GPU evolution. The Tesla C2070 was a professional compute-focused GPU from 2010 based on the Fermi architecture, while the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is a 2023 modern gaming and creative powerhouse.\n\nIn raw performance, the RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is in a completely different dimension, typically delivering 20 to 25 times the compute power in modern benchmarks. It features hardware-accelerated Ray Tracing and AI-powered DLSS 3, which were unimaginable when the Tesla card was released. While the Tesla C2070 was a revolutionary card for its time in HPC and scientific compute with its 6GB of GDDR5, its raw horsepower and lack of modern graphics pipelines make it obsolete for any contemporary software. The 16GB of modern VRAM on the 4060 Ti is also a massive upgrade over the legacy professional chip.\n\nUltimately, there is no practical comparison. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16GB is the definitive choice for any user seeking high-end performance today. The Tesla C2070 remains a piece of computing history, representing a much older era of professional compute that cannot compete with the speed or visual fidelity of a modern high-end gaming card.
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The GeForce RTX 4060 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2070 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 526.3% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2070.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-526.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+526.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $38 versus $299 for the GeForce RTX 4060, it costs 87% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 25.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+25.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($38) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($299) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2070 and GeForce RTX 4060
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
GeForce RTX 4060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1830 MHz to 2460 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,548 points. Launch price was $299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 19,548 — the GeForce RTX 4060 leads by 526.3%. The Tesla C2070 is built on Fermi while the GeForce RTX 4060 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 40 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2070) vs 3,072 (GeForce RTX 4060). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070) vs 15.11 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,121 | 19,548+526% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 3072+586% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS+1370% |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | 96+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.88 MB | 3 MB+241% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 24 MB+3100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla C2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) vs 24 MB (GeForce RTX 4060) — the GeForce RTX 4060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 24 MB+3100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4060). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 4+300% |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4060).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 8th gen |
| Decoder | — | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the GeForce RTX 4060's 115W — a 69.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 4060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 248mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 115W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 248mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 73°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 170.0+1198% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $38, while the GeForce RTX 4060 launched at $299 and now averages $299. The Tesla C2070 costs 87.3% less ($261 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.1 (Tesla C2070) vs 65.4 (GeForce RTX 4060) — the Tesla C2070 offers 25.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | GeForce RTX 4060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499 | $299-80% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $38-87% | $299 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.1+26% | 65.4 |
| Codename | GF100 | AD107 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #575 | #84 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2070 and GeForce RTX 4060
