Tesla C2070 vs Tesla M10 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Tesla C2070 vs Tesla M10 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Tesla C2070 vs Tesla M10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,001 less on MSRP ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 64% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla M10
2016Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌66.8% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$1,499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 2.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla C2070 vs Tesla M10 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2070 is built on Fermi while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2070) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,121 | 3,173+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 640 ×4+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4+63% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2070 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M10 carries 2 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Tesla C2070 and 64-bit on the Tesla M10. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070) vs 12_1 (Tesla M10). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 5.6% difference. The Tesla M10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 248mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 225W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 248mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 14.1+8% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Tesla C2070 came in at $1499, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Tesla C2070 was 40% cheaper ($1001 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.1 (Tesla C2070) vs 1.3 (Tesla M10) — the Tesla C2070 offers 61.5% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M10 (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-40% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.1+62% | 1.3 |
| Codename | GF100 | GM107 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #575 | #570 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















