Tesla C2070 vs Tesla M10
Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
Tesla M10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2070 is positioned at rank 287 and the Tesla M10 is on rank 334, so the Tesla C2070 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla C2070 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $38 (vs $500), it costs 92% less, resulting in a 1194.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1194.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($38) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2070 and Tesla M10
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2070 is built on Fermi while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2070) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,121 | 3,173+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 640 ×4+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4+63% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | 56+40% | 40 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+180% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2070 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M10 has 2 GB. The Tesla C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB+200% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070) vs 12_1 (Tesla M10). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 5.6% difference. The Tesla M10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 248mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 225W-5% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 248mm | 267mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.1 | 14.1+8% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 MSRP and currently averages $38, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500 and now averages $500. The Tesla C2070 costs 92.4% less ($462 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 82.1 (Tesla C2070) vs 6.3 (Tesla M10) — the Tesla C2070 offers 1203.2% better value. The Tesla M10 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2070 | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1499-40% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $38-92% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 82.1+1203% | 6.3 |
| Codename | GF100 | GM107 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #575 | #570 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2070 and Tesla M10
