Tesla C2070 vs Tesla K40m

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Tesla C2070 vs Tesla K40m FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Tesla C2070 vs Tesla K40m: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Tesla C2070

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla K40m

2013

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla K40m is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.7% in PassMark G3D (3,143 vs 3,121), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Tesla C2070 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 6 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla C2070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Tesla K40m still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Tesla C2070 vs Tesla K40m Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

Tesla K40m

The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2070 scores 3,121 and the Tesla K40m reaches 3,143 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2070 is built on Fermi while the Tesla K40m uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2070) vs 2,880 (Tesla K40m). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070) vs 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m).

Feature	Tesla C2070	Tesla K40m
G3D Mark Score	3,121	3,143
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	2880+543%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	5.046 TFLOPS+391%
ROPs	48	48
TMUs	56	240+329%
L1 Cache	896 KB+273%	240 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1.5 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla C2070	Tesla K40m
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2070 has 6 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla K40m carries 2 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 200% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Tesla C2070 and 64-bit on the Tesla K40m. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) vs 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) — the Tesla K40m has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla C2070	Tesla K40m
VRAM Capacity	6 GB+200%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	1.5 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2070 draws 238W versus the Tesla K40m's 245W — a 2.9% difference. The Tesla C2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2070) vs 350W (Tesla K40m). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Tesla C2070	Tesla K40m
TDP	238W-3%	245W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	248mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	13.1+2%	12.8

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Tesla K40m (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Tesla C2070	Tesla K40m
MSRP	$1499	—
Codename	GF100	GK110B
Release	July 25 2011	November 22 2013
Ranking	#575	#573

Search Tesla C2070 on Amazon

Search Tesla K40m on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.