
Quadro M1200

Tesla C2070
Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro M1200
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 238W, a 193W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
Tesla C2070
2011Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌428.9% higher power demand at 238W vs 45W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro M1200
The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,212+3% | 3,121 |
| Architecture | Maxwell | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640+43% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.399 TFLOPS+36% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 56+40% |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB | 896 KB+180% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro M1200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M1200 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2070. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell) | — |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | — |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP8 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 136.4% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-81% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 82°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 71.4+445% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro M1200 came in at $0, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Quadro M1200 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M1200) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M1200 (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Quadro M1200 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $1499 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.1 |
| Codename | GM107 | GF100 |
| Release | January 11 2017 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #567 | #575 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














