Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

2017Core: 1093 MHzBoost: 1150 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

2011Core: 574 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro M1200

2017

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 238W, a 193W reduction.
  • More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 6 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).

Tesla C2070

2011

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (6 GB vs 4 GB).

Trade-offs

  • 2011 hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 428.9% higher power demand at 238W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M1200 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (3,212 vs 3,121), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro M1200 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2011. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Tesla C2070 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla C2070 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro M1200 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro M1200 vs Tesla C2070 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro M1200

The Quadro M1200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1093 MHz to 1150 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,212 points.

NVIDIA

Tesla C2070

The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro M1200 scores 3,212 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro M1200 is built on Maxwell while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Quadro M1200) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.399 TFLOPS (Quadro M1200) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
G3D Mark Score
3,212+3%
3,121
Architecture
Maxwell
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
640+43%
448
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.399 TFLOPS+36%
1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
48+200%
TMUs
40
56+40%
L1 Cache
320 KB
896 KB+180%
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro M1200 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 carries 6 GB. Tesla C2070 gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro M1200 and 64-bit on the Tesla C2070. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Quadro M1200) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2070) — the Quadro M1200 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
6 GB+50%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+167%
0.75 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro M1200) vs 12 (11_0) (Tesla C2070). OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
DirectX
12 (11_0)
12 (11_0)
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4+300%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP8 (Quadro M1200) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Tesla C2070).

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
Encoder
3rd Gen NVENC (Maxwell)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
Codecs
H.264,HEVC,VP8
H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro M1200 draws 45W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 136.4% difference. The Quadro M1200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro M1200) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
TDP
45W-81%
238W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
248mm
Slots
0-100%
2
Temp (Load)
82°C
Perf/Watt
71.4+445%
13.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro M1200 came in at $0, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499. On MSRP, Quadro M1200 was 100+% cheaper ($1499 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Quadro M1200) vs 2.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Quadro M1200 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Quadro M1200 (2017 vs 2011).

FeatureQuadro M1200Tesla C2070
MSRP
$0-100%
$1499
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
2.1
Codename
GM107
GF100
Release
January 11 2017
July 25 2011
Ranking
#567
#575

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.