Tesla C2050 vs Tesla C2070
Tesla C2050
Popular choices:
Tesla C2070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 is positioned at rank 334 and the Tesla C2070 is on rank 287, so the Tesla C2070 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Tesla C2070 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (248mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2070 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2070 holds the technical lead. Priced at $38 (vs $95), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 145.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+145.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($95) | ✅More affordable ($38) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 and Tesla C2070
Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
Tesla C2070
The Tesla C2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,121 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2050 scores 3,176 and the Tesla C2070 reaches 3,121 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 is built on Fermi while the Tesla C2070 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050) vs 448 (Tesla C2070). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2070).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,176+2% | 3,121 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2050 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2070 has 6 GB. The Tesla C2070 offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB | 768 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2050 draws 238W versus the Tesla C2070's 238W — a 0% difference. The Tesla C2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050) vs 350W (Tesla C2070). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 248mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3+2% | 13.1 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2050 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the Tesla C2070 launched at $1499 and now averages $38. The Tesla C2070 costs 60% less ($57 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.4 (Tesla C2050) vs 82.1 (Tesla C2070) — the Tesla C2070 offers 145.8% better value.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Tesla C2070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $1499-40% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95 | $38-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.4 | 82.1+146% |
| Codename | GF100 | GF100 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #569 | #575 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2050 and Tesla C2070
