
Radeon R9 M470X

Tesla C2050
Radeon R9 M470X vs Tesla C2050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 M470X vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Radeon R9 M470X vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 M470X
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,149 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 629.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
- ✅Draws 75W instead of 238W, a 163W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Tesla C2050
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌614% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
- ❌217.3% higher power demand at 238W vs 75W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M470X vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M470X
The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M470X scores 3,244 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M470X is built on GCN 2.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 896 (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,244+2% | 3,176 |
| Architecture | GCN 2.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 896+100% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.971 TFLOPS+92% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 224 KB | 896 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M470X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 carries 2 GB. Radeon R9 M470X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470X and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2050) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 768 KB+200% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M470X draws 75W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 104.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: Mobile vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-68% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 43.3+226% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 M470X came in at $350, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M470X was 86% cheaper ($2149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) vs 1.3 (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon R9 M470X offers 615.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470X (2016 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M470X | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $350-86% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 9.3+615% | 1.3 |
| Codename | Emerald | GF100 |
| Release | May 15 2016 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #563 | #569 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














