GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470X

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

2013

Why buy it

✅17.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Delivers 76.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.4 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
✅Draws 2W instead of 75W, a 73W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R9 M470X

2016

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅More future proof: GCN 2.0 (2013−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 755M SLI across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
75% HIGHER MSRP
$350 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 9.3 vs 16.4 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌3650% higher power demand at 75W vs 2W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 755M SLI is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (3,280 vs 3,244), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 755M SLI is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 755M SLI makes the most sense to buy today. It is $150 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $350, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 76.9% (16.4 vs 9.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GT 755M SLI vs Radeon R9 M470X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 755M SLI

The GeForce GT 755M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 980 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 2W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,280 points.

Radeon R9 M470X

The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 755M SLI scores 3,280 and the Radeon R9 M470X reaches 3,244 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is built on Kepler while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 768 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Radeon R9 M470X
G3D Mark Score	3,280+1%	3,244
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768	896+17%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R9 M470X leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Radeon R9 M470X
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 755M SLI has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M470X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce GT 755M SLI and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470X.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Radeon R9 M470X
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 755M SLI draws 2W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 189.6% difference. The GeForce GT 755M SLI is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Radeon R9 M470X
TDP	2W-97%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	90°C	—
Perf/Watt	1640.0+3688%	43.3

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 755M SLI came in at $200, while the Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350. On MSRP, GeForce GT 755M SLI was 42.9% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.4 (GeForce GT 755M SLI) vs 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) — the GeForce GT 755M SLI offers 76.3% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R9 M470X (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 755M SLI	Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP	$200-43%	$350
Performance per Dollar	16.4+76%	9.3
Codename	N14P-?	Emerald
Release	November 1 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#554	#563

Search GeForce GT 755M SLI on Amazon

Search Radeon R9 M470X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.