P102-100 vs Radeon R9 M470X

P102-100

2018Core: 1582 MHzBoost: 1683 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M470X

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz
Similar parts
·······

P102-100 vs Radeon R9 M470X Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

P102-100 vs Radeon R9 M470X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

P102-100

2018

Why buy it

  • Radeon R9 M470X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so P102-100 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2018 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 71.4% HIGHER MSRP
    $600 MSRPvs$350 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.5 vs 9.3 G3D/$ ($600 MSRP vs $350 MSRP).
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 75W.

Radeon R9 M470X

2016

Why buy it

  • Costs $250 less on MSRP ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • Delivers 68.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.3 vs 5.5 G3D/$ ($350 MSRP vs $600 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
  • Draws 75W instead of 250W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2016 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
P102-100 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (3,301 vs 3,244), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
P102-100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 16nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2018 generation instead of 2016. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 M470X makes the most sense to buy today. It is $250 cheaper on MSRP at $350 vs $600, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 68.5% (9.3 vs 5.5), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R9 M470X is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, P102-100 has the stronger long-term case.

P102-100 vs Radeon R9 M470X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

P102-100

The P102-100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1582 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 3200 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,301 points. Launch price was $599.

AMD

Radeon R9 M470X

The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

Graphics Performance

The P102-100 scores 3,301 and the Radeon R9 M470X reaches 3,244 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The P102-100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,200 (P102-100) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X). Raw compute: 10.77 TFLOPS (P102-100) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1100 MHz.

FeatureP102-100Radeon R9 M470X
G3D Mark Score
3,301+2%
3,244
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 2.0
Process Node
16 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3200+257%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
10.77 TFLOPS+446%
1.971 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1683 MHz+53%
1100 MHz
ROPs
80+400%
16
TMUs
200+257%
56
L1 Cache
1.2 MB+445%
0.22 MB
L2 Cache
2.5 MB+900%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureP102-100Radeon R9 M470X
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The P102-100 has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470X carries 4 GB. Radeon R9 M470X gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the P102-100 and 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M470X. L2 Cache: 2.5 MB (P102-100) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M470X) — the P102-100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureP102-100Radeon R9 M470X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
2.5 MB+900%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The P102-100 draws 250W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (P102-100) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureP102-100Radeon R9 M470X
TDP
250W
75W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
267mm
Slots
2
Perf/Watt
13.2
43.3+228%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the P102-100 came in at $600, while the Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350. On MSRP, Radeon R9 M470X was 41.7% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.5 (P102-100) vs 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) — the Radeon R9 M470X offers 69.1% better value. The newer card here is P102-100 (2018 vs 2016).

FeatureP102-100Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP
$600
$350-42%
Performance per Dollar
5.5
9.3+69%
Codename
GP102
Emerald
Release
February 12 2018
May 15 2016
Ranking
#560
#563

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.