Quadro K5100M vs Tesla C2050

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro K5100M vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro K5100M vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro K5100M

2013

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 100W instead of 238W, a 138W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 1.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).

Tesla C2050

2011

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 1.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌138% higher power demand at 238W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro K5100M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.8% in PassMark G3D (3,264 vs 3,176), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro K5100M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 8 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, a 28nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2013 generation instead of 2011. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla C2050 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Tesla C2050 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro K5100M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro K5100M vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro K5100M

The Quadro K5100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 771 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,264 points.

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro K5100M scores 3,264 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K5100M is built on Kepler while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (Quadro K5100M) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 2.369 TFLOPS (Quadro K5100M) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Tesla C2050
G3D Mark Score	3,264+3%	3,176
Architecture	Kepler	Fermi
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	1536+243%	448
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.369 TFLOPS+130%	1.028 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	48+50%
TMUs	128+129%	56
L1 Cache	128 KB	896 KB+600%
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Tesla C2050
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro K5100M has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla C2050 carries 2 GB. Quadro K5100M gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro K5100M and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Quadro K5100M) vs 768 KB (Tesla C2050) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Tesla C2050
VRAM Capacity	8 GB+300%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB	768 KB+50%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro K5100M draws 100W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 81.7% difference. The Quadro K5100M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K5100M) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Tesla C2050
TDP	100W-58%	238W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	32.6+145%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro K5100M (2013 vs 2011).

Feature	Quadro K5100M	Tesla C2050
MSRP	—	$2499
Codename	GK104	GF100
Release	July 23 2013	July 25 2011
Ranking	#562	#569

Search Quadro K5100M on Amazon

Search Tesla C2050 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.