Tesla C2050 vs Tesla M10

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Tesla C2050 vs Tesla M10 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Tesla C2050 vs Tesla M10: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Tesla C2050

2011

Why buy it

✅Costs $1 less on MSRP ($2,499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Tesla M10

2016

Why buy it

✅More future proof: Maxwell (2014−2017) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
0% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$2,499 MSRP

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Tesla C2050 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.1% in PassMark G3D (3,176 vs 3,173), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Tesla C2050 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Tesla C2050 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1 cheaper on MSRP at $2,499 vs $2,500, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 0.1% (1.3 vs 1.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Tesla C2050 vs Tesla M10 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

Tesla M10

The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 scores 3,176 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 is built on Fermi while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10).

Feature	Tesla C2050	Tesla M10
G3D Mark Score	3,176	3,173
Architecture	Fermi	Maxwell
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	448	640 ×4+43%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.028 TFLOPS	1.672 TFLOPS ×4+63%
ROPs	48+200%	16 ×4
TMUs	56+40%	40 ×4
L1 Cache	896 KB+180%	320 KB
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Tesla C2050	Tesla M10
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 2 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Tesla C2050 and 64-bit on the Tesla M10. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Tesla C2050	Tesla M10
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.75 MB	2 MB+167%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 draws 238W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 5.6% difference. The Tesla M10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Tesla C2050	Tesla M10
TDP	238W	225W-5%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	267mm
Slots	—	2
Perf/Watt	13.3	14.1+6%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Tesla C2050 came in at $2499, while the Tesla M10 launched at $2500. On MSRP, Tesla C2050 was 0% cheaper ($1 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 1.3 (Tesla C2050) vs 1.3 (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Tesla M10 (2016 vs 2011).

Feature	Tesla C2050	Tesla M10
MSRP	$2499	$2500
Performance per Dollar	1.3	1.3
Codename	GF100	GM107
Release	July 25 2011	May 18 2016
Ranking	#569	#570

Search Tesla C2050 on Amazon

Search Tesla M10 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.