Tesla C2050
VS
Radeon R9 M290X

Tesla C2050 vs Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050

2011Core: 574 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

2014Core: 850 MHzBoost: 900 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 is positioned at rank 334 and the Radeon R9 M290X is on rank 399, so the Tesla C2050 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
83%
#318
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11632%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
100%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
100%
#335
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
99%
#336
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
98%
#337
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
98%
#338
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
97%
#339
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
92%
#340
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#341
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
85%
#342
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
84%
#343
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
83%
#345
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
82%
#346
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
81%
#347
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M290X

#388
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1349%
#390
1223%
#391
1219%
#395
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1109%
#396
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1101%
#399
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
100%
#400
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#401
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
99%
#402
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
97%
#403
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
97%
#405
97%
#406
Radeon HD 8650G + 7700M Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
93%
#407
Radeon R9 M290X Crossfire
MSRP: $800|Avg: $200
93%
#408
GeForce GTX 285M SLI
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
#409
Radeon R7 M260X
MSRP: $139|Avg: $35
91%
#410
90%
#411
Intel UHD Graphics 615
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
89%
#412
Radeon R7 A365
MSRP: $109|Avg: $55
89%
#413
Radeon 3015e
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M290X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2050.

InsightTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)
Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon R9 M290X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R9 M290X holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $95), it costs 37% less, resulting in a 60.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+60.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($95)
More affordable ($60)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 and Radeon R9 M290X

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M290X

The Radeon R9 M290X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 850 MHz to 900 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,218 points.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 scores 3,176 and the Radeon R9 M290X reaches 3,218 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M290X uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050) vs 1,280 (Radeon R9 M290X). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050) vs 2.304 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M290X).

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
G3D Mark Score
3,176
3,218+1%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 1.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448
1280+186%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.028 TFLOPS
2.304 TFLOPS+124%
ROPs
48+50%
32
TMUs
56
80+43%
L1 Cache
896 KB+180%
320 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2050 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M290X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M290X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2050) vs 512 KB (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+50%
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 draws 238W versus the Radeon R9 M290X's 100W — a 81.7% difference. The Radeon R9 M290X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M290X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
TDP
238W
100W-58%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Perf/Watt
13.3
32.2+142%
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2050 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the Radeon R9 M290X launched at $400 and now averages $60. The Radeon R9 M290X costs 36.8% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.4 (Tesla C2050) vs 53.6 (Radeon R9 M290X) — the Radeon R9 M290X offers 60.5% better value. The Radeon R9 M290X is the newer GPU (2014 vs 2011).

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP
$2499
$400-84%
Avg Price (30d)
$95
$60-37%
Performance per Dollar
33.4
53.6+60%
Codename
GF100
Neptune
Release
July 25 2011
January 9 2014
Ranking
#569
#566