Tesla C2050 vs Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Tesla C2050
Popular choices:
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2050 is positioned at rank #334 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is significantly newer (2025 vs 2011). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2050.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $95 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H, it costs 79% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 363.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+363.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($95) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 and Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2050 scores 3,176 and the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H reaches 3,245 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 is built on Fermi while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050) vs 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,176 | 3,245+2% |
| Architecture | Fermi | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 1792+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 16.49 TFLOPS+1504% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 56 | 112+100% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: 64-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) vs 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2050 draws 238W versus the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H's 43W — a 138.8% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050) vs 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 43W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 75.5+468% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2050 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H launched at $450 and now averages $450. The Tesla C2050 costs 78.9% less ($355 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.4 (Tesla C2050) vs 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) — the Tesla C2050 offers 363.9% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $450-82% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95-79% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.4+364% | 7.2 |
| Codename | GF100 | Navi 33 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #569 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2050 and Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
