Tesla C2050
VS
Radeon R9 M470X

Tesla C2050 vs Radeon R9 M470X

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050

2011Core: 574 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon R9 M470X

2016Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1100 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla C2050 is positioned at rank 334 and the Radeon R9 M470X is on rank 377, so the Tesla C2050 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050

#117
L40
MSRP: $31000|Avg: $8174
83%
#318
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
11632%
#333
Tesla M10
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
100%
#334
Tesla C2050
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95
100%
#335
FirePro S10000
MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500
99%
#336
Quadro FX 3450
MSRP: $119|Avg: $30
98%
#337
GRID P40-24Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $200
98%
#338
Quadro 4000
MSRP: $1199|Avg: $30
97%
#339
FireStream 9250
MSRP: $999|Avg: $49
92%
#340
GRID P40-3Q
MSRP: $5699|Avg: $5699
91%
#341
GRID M10-2Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $150
85%
#342
Tesla K80
MSRP: $5000|Avg: $50
84%
#343
GRID M10-4Q
MSRP: $2805|Avg: $340
83%
#345
GRID M10-8Q
MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500
82%
#346
FirePro V8700
MSRP: $1499|Avg: $170
81%
#347
Quadro FX 3800
MSRP: $799|Avg: $20
81%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M470X

#367
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1171%
#369
1062%
#370
1059%
#374
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
963%
#375
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
956%
#377
Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
100%
#379
Radeon R9 M380
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#380
Radeon HD 7640G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
98%
#384
Radeon R7 M465
MSRP: $120|Avg: $35
95%
#386
GeForce GT 640M LE
MSRP: $80|Avg: $20
94%
#387
Radeon Vega 8 Ryzen 5 3450U
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
94%
#388
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
MSRP: $200|Avg: $50
93%
#389
HD Graphics 520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $35
93%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
93%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 M470X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2050.

InsightTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)
Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Tesla C2050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 holds the technical lead. Priced at $95 (vs $350), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 260.7% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+260.7%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($95)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($350)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 and Radeon R9 M470X

NVIDIA

Tesla C2050

The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.

AMD

Radeon R9 M470X

The Radeon R9 M470X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1100 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,244 points.

Graphics Performance

The Tesla C2050 scores 3,176 and the Radeon R9 M470X reaches 3,244 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 is built on Fermi while the Radeon R9 M470X uses GCN 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050) vs 896 (Radeon R9 M470X). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050) vs 1.971 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M470X).

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
G3D Mark Score
3,176
3,244+2%
Architecture
Fermi
GCN 2.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
448
896+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.028 TFLOPS
1.971 TFLOPS+92%
ROPs
48+200%
16
TMUs
56
56
L1 Cache
896 KB+300%
224 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Tesla C2050 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R9 M470X has 4 GB. The Radeon R9 M470X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2050) vs 256 KB (Radeon R9 M470X) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
VRAM Capacity
2 GB
4 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
768 KB+200%
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Tesla C2050 draws 238W versus the Radeon R9 M470X's 75W — a 104.2% difference. The Radeon R9 M470X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050) vs 350W (Radeon R9 M470X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
TDP
238W
75W-68%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Perf/Watt
13.3
43.3+226%
💰

Value Analysis

The Tesla C2050 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the Radeon R9 M470X launched at $350 and now averages $350. The Tesla C2050 costs 72.9% less ($255 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.4 (Tesla C2050) vs 9.3 (Radeon R9 M470X) — the Tesla C2050 offers 259.1% better value. The Radeon R9 M470X is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2011).

FeatureTesla C2050Radeon R9 M470X
MSRP
$2499
$350-86%
Avg Price (30d)
$95-73%
$350
Performance per Dollar
33.4+259%
9.3
Codename
GF100
Emerald
Release
July 25 2011
May 15 2016
Ranking
#569
#563