Tesla C2050 vs GeForce GTX 470
Tesla C2050
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 470
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla C2050 is positioned at rank #334 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla C2050 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score and 60% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 470.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+60%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla C2050 holds the technical lead. Priced at $95 (vs $349), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 271% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+271%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($95) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($349) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla C2050 and GeForce GTX 470
Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
GeForce GTX 470
The GeForce GTX 470 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 26 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 215W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,145 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla C2050 scores 3,176 and the GeForce GTX 470 reaches 3,145 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla C2050 is built on Fermi while the GeForce GTX 470 uses Fermi, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 448 (Tesla C2050) vs 448 (GeForce GTX 470). Raw compute: 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050) vs 1.089 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 470).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,176 | 3,145 |
| Architecture | Fermi | Fermi |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 448 | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.028 TFLOPS | 1.089 TFLOPS+6% |
| ROPs | 48+20% | 40 |
| TMUs | 56 | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+20% | 640 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla C2050 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 470 has 1 GB. The Tesla C2050 offers 60% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla C2050) vs 640 KB (GeForce GTX 470) — the Tesla C2050 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+60% | 1.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+20% | 640 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla C2050 draws 238W versus the GeForce GTX 470's 215W — a 10.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 470 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla C2050) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 470). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 238W | 215W-10% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 241mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 93 |
| Perf/Watt | 13.3 | 14.6+10% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla C2050 launched at $2499 MSRP and currently averages $95, while the GeForce GTX 470 launched at $349 and now averages $349. The Tesla C2050 costs 72.8% less ($254 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 33.4 (Tesla C2050) vs 9.0 (GeForce GTX 470) — the Tesla C2050 offers 271.1% better value. The Tesla C2050 is the newer GPU (2011 vs 2010).
| Feature | Tesla C2050 | GeForce GTX 470 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2499 | $349-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $95-73% | $349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 33.4+271% | 9.0 |
| Codename | GF100 | GF100 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | March 26 2010 |
| Ranking | #569 | #572 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla C2050 and GeForce GTX 470
