
Tesla K40m vs GRID P4-2Q

Tesla K40m
Popular choices:

GRID P4-2Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K40m is positioned at rank 137 and the GRID P4-2Q is on rank 285, so the Tesla K40m offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40m
Performance Per Dollar GRID P4-2Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P4-2Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40m.
| Insight | Tesla K40m | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID P4-2Q remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40m and GRID P4-2Q

Tesla K40m
The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.

GRID P4-2Q
The GRID P4-2Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,162 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K40m scores 3,143 and the GRID P4-2Q reaches 3,162 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K40m is built on Kepler while the GRID P4-2Q uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40m) vs 2,048 (GRID P4-2Q). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID P4-2Q). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K40m | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,143 | 3,162 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+41% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS+5% | 4.825 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1178 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 240+88% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 768 KB+220% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K40m | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) vs 2 MB (GRID P4-2Q) — the GRID P4-2Q has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K40m | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K40m draws 245W versus the GRID P4-2Q's 225W — a 8.5% difference. The GRID P4-2Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40m) vs 350W (GRID P4-2Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla K40m | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W | 225W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 12.8 | 14.1+10% |
Value Analysis
The GRID P4-2Q is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K40m | GRID P4-2Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $1500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $235 |
| Codename | GK110B | GM204 |
| Release | November 22 2013 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #573 | #433 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















