
Tesla K40m vs Tesla M10

Tesla K40m
Popular choices:

Tesla M10
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla K40m is positioned at rank 137 and the Tesla M10 is on rank 334, so the Tesla K40m offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla K40m
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M10
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla K40m.
| Insight | Tesla K40m | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Tesla M10 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla K40m and Tesla M10

Tesla K40m
The Tesla K40m is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 745 MHz to 876 MHz. It has 2880 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 245W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,143 points. Launch price was $7,699.

Tesla M10
The Tesla M10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1033 MHz to 1306 MHz. It has 640 ×4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,173 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla K40m scores 3,143 and the Tesla M10 reaches 3,173 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla K40m is built on Kepler while the Tesla M10 uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 2,880 (Tesla K40m) vs 640 (Tesla M10). Raw compute: 5.046 TFLOPS (Tesla K40m) vs 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 (Tesla M10). Boost clocks: 876 MHz vs 1306 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla K40m | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,143 | 3,173 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2880+350% | 640 ×4 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.046 TFLOPS+202% | 1.672 TFLOPS ×4 |
| Boost Clock | 876 MHz | 1306 MHz+49% |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 ×4 |
| TMUs | 240+500% | 40 ×4 |
| L1 Cache | 240 KB | 320 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla K40m | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Tesla K40m) vs 2 MB (Tesla M10) — the Tesla M10 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla K40m | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla K40m draws 245W versus the Tesla M10's 225W — a 8.5% difference. The Tesla M10 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla K40m) vs 350W (Tesla M10). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Tesla K40m | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 245W | 225W-8% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 267mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Perf/Watt | 12.8 | 14.1+10% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M10 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Tesla K40m | Tesla M10 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $500 |
| Codename | GK110B | GM107 |
| Release | November 22 2013 | May 18 2016 |
| Ranking | #573 | #570 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















