Tesla M2090 vs GeForce GTX 660M
Tesla M2090
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 660M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2090 is positioned at rank 379 and the GeForce GTX 660M is on rank 190, so the GeForce GTX 660M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 660M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 660M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2090.
| Insight | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 660M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2090 and GeForce GTX 660M
Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
GeForce GTX 660M
The GeForce GTX 660M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 835 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,452 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M2090 scores 1,400 and the GeForce GTX 660M reaches 1,452 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2090 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 660M uses Kepler, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Tesla M2090) vs 384 (GeForce GTX 660M). Raw compute: 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090) vs 0.7296 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 660M).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,400 | 1,452+4% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.332 TFLOPS+83% | 0.7296 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+200% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+3233% | 0.03 MB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M2090 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 660M has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 660M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Tesla M2090) vs 256 KB (GeForce GTX 660M) — the Tesla M2090 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+200% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce GTX 660M). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GTX 660M).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | NVENC 1st Gen |
| Decoder | — | PureVideo HD VP5 |
| Codecs | CUDA,OpenCL | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M2090 draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 660M's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 660M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2090) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 660M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 248mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 60°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.6 | 29.0+418% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 660M is the newer GPU (2012 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce GTX 660M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | — |
| Codename | GF110 | GK107 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | March 22 2012 |
| Ranking | #530 | #774 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M2090 and GeForce GTX 660M
