Tesla M2090 vs GeForce MX110
Tesla M2090
Popular choices:
GeForce MX110
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Tesla M2090 is positioned at rank 379 and the GeForce MX110 is on rank 315, so the GeForce MX110 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX110
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce MX110 is significantly newer (2017 vs 2011). The GeForce MX110 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M2090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX110 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2090.
| Insight | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce MX110 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce MX110 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $40), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 1.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2090 and GeForce MX110
Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
GeForce MX110
The GeForce MX110 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 17 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 978 MHz to 1006 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,415 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M2090 scores 1,400 and the GeForce MX110 reaches 1,415 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M2090 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the GeForce MX110 uses Maxwell, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Tesla M2090) vs 256 (GeForce MX110). Raw compute: 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090) vs 0.5151 TFLOPS (GeForce MX110).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,400 | 1,415+1% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+100% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.332 TFLOPS+159% | 0.5151 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 48+500% | 8 |
| TMUs | 64+300% | 16 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+669% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) vs 1 MB (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M2090 draws 250W versus the GeForce MX110's 30W — a 157.1% difference. The GeForce MX110 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2090) vs 350W (GeForce MX110). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 30W-88% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 248mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 5.6 | 47.2+743% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M2090 launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce MX110 launched at $100 and now averages $40. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.0 (Tesla M2090) vs 35.4 (GeForce MX110) — the GeForce MX110 offers 1.1% better value. The GeForce MX110 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | GeForce MX110 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $100-96% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0 | 35.4+1% |
| Codename | GF110 | GM108S |
| Release | July 25 2011 | November 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #530 | #781 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M2090 and GeForce MX110
