Tesla M2090 vs Radeon RX 7600
Tesla M2090
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Tesla M2090 is positioned at rank #379 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M2090
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7600 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2011). The Radeon RX 7600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M2090 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1084.4% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M2090.
| Insight | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1084.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1084.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (248mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7600 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $250 (vs $40), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 89.5% better value per dollar than the Tesla M2090.
| Insight | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+89.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($250) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M2090 and Radeon RX 7600
Tesla M2090
The Tesla M2090 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 651 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,400 points.
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla M2090 scores 1,400 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 1084.4%. The Tesla M2090 is built on Fermi 2.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 512 (Tesla M2090) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 1.332 TFLOPS (Tesla M2090) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,400 | 16,581+1084% |
| Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 2048+300% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.332 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS+1533% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla M2090 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M2090 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon RX 7600 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.75 MB (Tesla M2090) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 8 GB+1500% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.75 MB | 2 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (Tesla M2090) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12.2+2% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Supported codecs: CUDA,OpenCL (Tesla M2090) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | — | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | CUDA,OpenCL | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M2090 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 41% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Tesla M2090) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 248mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 165W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 248mm | 240mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 5.6 | 100.5+1695% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M2090 launched at $2500 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 and now averages $250. The Tesla M2090 costs 84% less ($210 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 35.0 (Tesla M2090) vs 66.3 (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 89.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2011).
| Feature | Tesla M2090 | Radeon RX 7600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $269-89% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-84% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.0 | 66.3+89% |
| Codename | GF110 | Navi 33 |
| Release | July 25 2011 | May 24 2023 |
| Ranking | #530 | #118 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M2090 and Radeon RX 7600
