Tesla M40 24GB vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40 24GB
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla M40 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M40 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER.
| Insight | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $81 versus $120 for the Tesla M40 24GB, it costs 33% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 41.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+41.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($120) | ✅More affordable ($81) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M40 24GB and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,186 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M40 24GB scores 10,641 and the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER reaches 10,186 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M40 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Raw compute: 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 4.416 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Boost clocks: 1112 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,641+4% | 10,186 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072+140% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.832 TFLOPS+55% | 4.416 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1112 MHz | 1725 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 192+140% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 1.3 MB+18% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Tesla M40 24GB comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER has 4 GB. The Tesla M40 24GB offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the Tesla M40 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+200% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER).
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M40 24GB draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 100W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6 | 101.9+139% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER launched at $159 and now averages $81. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER costs 32.5% less ($39 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 88.7 (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 125.8 (GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER) — the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER offers 41.8% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $159-92% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120 | $81-33% |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.7 | 125.8+42% |
| Codename | GM200 | TU116 |
| Release | November 10 2015 | November 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #253 | #258 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M40 24GB and GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
