Tesla M40 24GB vs Tesla M40
Tesla M40 24GB
Popular choices:
Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40 24GB
Performance Per Dollar Tesla M40
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla M40 24GB is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla M40.
| Insight | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla M40 24GB offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Tesla M40 24GB holds the technical lead. Priced at $120 (vs $1,099), it costs 89% less, resulting in a 853.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+853.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($120) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,099) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla M40 24GB and Tesla M40
Tesla M40 24GB
The Tesla M40 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,641 points.
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
The Tesla M40 24GB scores 10,641 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Tesla M40 24GB is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 3,072 (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1112 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 10,641+4% | 10,220 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3072 | 3072 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.832 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1112 MHz | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 192 | 192 |
| L1 Cache | 1.1 MB | 1.1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 0.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (2x) (Tesla M40 24GB) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Tesla M40 24GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 (2x) | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla M40 24GB draws 250W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 0% difference. The Tesla M40 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 42.6+4% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The Tesla M40 24GB launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $120, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500 and now averages $1099. The Tesla M40 24GB costs 89.1% less ($979 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 88.7 (Tesla M40 24GB) vs 9.3 (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 24GB offers 853.8% better value.
| Feature | Tesla M40 24GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000-20% | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $120-89% | $1099 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.7+854% | 9.3 |
| Codename | GM200 | GM200 |
| Release | November 10 2015 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #253 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla M40 24GB and Tesla M40
