
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Popular choices:

Tesla M40
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1156.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016Tesla M40
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,301 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1106.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 49.3 vs 4.1 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 250W, a 130W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 3 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 3 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 3 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1156.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.1 vs 49.3 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌108.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is Tesla M40 better than GeForce GTX 1060 3GB?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1060 3GB make more sense than Tesla M40?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 151 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 58 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 121 FPS |
| medium | 70 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 58 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 49 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 41 FPS | 42 FPS |
| medium | 38 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 27 FPS | 24 FPS |
| ultra | 24 FPS | 20 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 191 FPS | 248 FPS |
| medium | 161 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 132 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 94 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 101 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 80 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 61 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 54 FPS | 96 FPS |
| medium | 45 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 43 FPS | 65 FPS |
| ultra | 35 FPS | 49 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 379 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 368 FPS |
| high | 246 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 204 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 345 FPS |
| medium | 265 FPS | 276 FPS |
| high | 207 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 166 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 187 FPS | 230 FPS |
| medium | 160 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 115 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 293 FPS |
| medium | 206 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 186 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 196 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 136 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 97 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 73 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 65 FPS | 80 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 61 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1060 3GB and Tesla M40

GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 18 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1708 MHz. It has 1152 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,815 points. Launch price was $199.

Tesla M40
Tesla M40
The Tesla M40 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 10 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 948 MHz to 1112 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,220 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB scores 9,815 and the Tesla M40 reaches 10,220 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is built on Pascal while the Tesla M40 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,152 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 3,072 (Tesla M40). Raw compute: 3.935 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 6.832 TFLOPS (Tesla M40). Boost clocks: 1708 MHz vs 1112 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,815 | 10,220+4% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1152 | 3072+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.935 TFLOPS | 6.832 TFLOPS+74% |
| Boost Clock | 1708 MHz+54% | 1112 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 72 | 192+167% |
| L1 Cache | 0.42 MB | 1.1 MB+162% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Tesla M40 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Tesla M40 has 8 GB. The Tesla M40 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 3 MB (Tesla M40) — the Tesla M40 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 3 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 12.0 (Tesla M40). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 4.0 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs NVENC 2.0 (2x) (Tesla M40). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (Tesla M40).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 4.0 | NVENC 2.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB draws 120W versus the Tesla M40's 250W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 400W (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 500W (Tesla M40). Power connectors: 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 250mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-52% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 400W-20% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 250mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.8+100% | 40.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB launched at $199 MSRP, while the Tesla M40 launched at $2500. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB costs 92% less ($2301 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 49.3 (GeForce GTX 1060 3GB) vs 4.1 (Tesla M40) — the GeForce GTX 1060 3GB offers 1102.4% better value. The GeForce GTX 1060 3GB is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1060 3GB | Tesla M40 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-92% | $2500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.3+1102% | 4.1 |
| Codename | GP106 | GM200 |
| Release | August 18 2016 | November 10 2015 |
| Ranking | #272 | #256 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













