Tesla T10 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla T10
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Tesla T10
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is significantly newer (2022 vs 0). The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla T10 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Tesla T10 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM.
| Insight | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $975 for the Tesla T10, it costs 85% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 515.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+515.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($975) | ✅More affordable ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Tesla T10 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Tesla T10
The Tesla T10 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in sem dados. It features the Turing architecture. The boost clock speed is 1560 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 260W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,558 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Tesla T10 scores 12,558 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the Tesla T10 leads by 5.6%. The Tesla T10 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,608 (Tesla T10) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 14.38 TFLOPS (Tesla T10) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 1560 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,558+6% | 11,892 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4608+80% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.38 TFLOPS+60% | 8.986 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1560 MHz | 1755 MHz+13% |
| ROPs | 96+200% | 32 |
| TMUs | 288+260% | 80 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Tesla T10) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Tesla T10) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Tesla T10) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM).
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Tesla T10 draws 260W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Tesla T10) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 260W | 130W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 235mm |
| Height | 111mm | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 48.3 | 91.5+89% |
Value Analysis
The Tesla T10 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $975, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM costs 84.6% less ($825 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.9 (Tesla T10) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 514.7% better value.
| Feature | Tesla T10 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $249-88% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $975 | $150-85% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.9 | 79.3+515% |
| Codename | TU102 | GA106 |
| Release | sem dados | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #213 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Tesla T10 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
