TITAN Xp vs Quadro GV100
TITAN Xp
Popular choices:
Quadro GV100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GV100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro GV100 uses modern memory architecture. The Quadro GV100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN Xp lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro GV100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score and 166.7% more VRAM (32 GB vs 12 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the TITAN Xp.
| Insight | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Volta (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+166.7%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN Xp offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $8,999 for the Quadro GV100, it costs 98% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 5817% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+5817%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($8,999) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN Xp and Quadro GV100
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Quadro GV100
The Quadro GV100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 27 2018. It features the Volta architecture. The core clock ranges from 1132 MHz to 1627 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 19,013 points. Launch price was $8,999.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN Xp scores 18,752 and the Quadro GV100 reaches 19,013 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN Xp is built on Pascal while the Quadro GV100 uses Volta, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (TITAN Xp) vs 5,120 (Quadro GV100). Raw compute: 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp) vs 16.66 TFLOPS (Quadro GV100). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1627 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,752 | 19,013+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Volta |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 5120+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.15 TFLOPS | 16.66 TFLOPS+37% |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1627 MHz+3% |
| ROPs | 96 | 128+33% |
| TMUs | 240 | 320+33% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 10 MB+614% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN Xp comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GV100 has 32 GB. The Quadro GV100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GV100) — a 87% advantage for the Quadro GV100. Bus width: 384-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (TITAN Xp) vs 6 MB (Quadro GV100) — the Quadro GV100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 547.7 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+87% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 4096-bit+967% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 6 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 12.1 (Quadro GV100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp) vs NVENC 6th Gen (Quadro GV100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp) vs H.264,H.265 (Quadro GV100).
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN Xp draws 250W versus the Quadro GV100's 250W — a 0% difference. The Quadro GV100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN Xp) vs 650W (Quadro GV100). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 76.1+1% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN Xp launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Quadro GV100 launched at $8999 and now averages $8999. The TITAN Xp costs 98.3% less ($8849 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 2.1 (Quadro GV100) — the TITAN Xp offers 5852.4% better value. The Quadro GV100 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Quadro GV100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-87% | $8999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-98% | $8999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.0+5852% | 2.1 |
| Codename | GP102 | GV100 |
| Release | April 6 2017 | March 27 2018 |
| Ranking | #87 | #89 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN Xp and Quadro GV100
