TITAN Xp vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce GTX 1650 uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1650 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN Xp lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The TITAN Xp is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 138.3% higher G3D Mark score and 200% more VRAM (12 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+138.3%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-138.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+200%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The TITAN Xp offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $150 (vs $75), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 19.2% better value per dollar than the GeForce GTX 1650.

Insight	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+19.2%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150)	✅More affordable ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

TITAN Xp Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of TITAN Xp and GeForce GTX 1650

TITAN Xp

The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the TITAN Xp scores 18,752 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the TITAN Xp leads by 138.3%. The TITAN Xp is built on Pascal while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (TITAN Xp) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	18,752+138%	7,869
Architecture	Pascal	Turing
Process Node	16 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840+329%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.15 TFLOPS+307%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1582 MHz	1665 MHz+5%
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+329%	56
L1 Cache	1.4 MB+59%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The TITAN Xp comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The TITAN Xp offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 327.9% advantage for the TITAN Xp. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (TITAN Xp) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the TITAN Xp has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	12 GB+200%	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	547.7 GB/s+328%	128 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+200%	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12.0	12
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1650).

Feature	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	NVENC 5.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The TITAN Xp draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN Xp) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	TITAN Xp	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	600W	300W-50%
Power Connector	6-pin + 8-pin	None
Length	267mm	229mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	75.0	104.9+40%

💰

Value Analysis

The TITAN Xp launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The GeForce GTX 1650 costs 50% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the TITAN Xp offers 19.2% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).