TITAN Xp vs Radeon RX 6700
TITAN Xp
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 6700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 6700 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon RX 6700 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN Xp lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 6700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the TITAN Xp offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+20%) | 🎮 High Capacity (10 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN Xp offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $300 for the Radeon RX 6700, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 98.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+98.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN Xp and Radeon RX 6700
TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Radeon RX 6700
The Radeon RX 6700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 9 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1941 MHz to 2450 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,920 points.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN Xp scores 18,752 and the Radeon RX 6700 reaches 18,920 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN Xp is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 6700 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (TITAN Xp) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 6700). Raw compute: 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp) vs 11.29 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 2450 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,752 | 18,920 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+67% | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.15 TFLOPS+8% | 11.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 2450 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240+67% | 144 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+180% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6700 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The TITAN Xp lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN Xp comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6700 has 10 GB. The TITAN Xp offers 20% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) vs 320 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700) — a 71.2% advantage for the TITAN Xp. Bus width: 384-bit vs 160-bit.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB+20% | 10 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 547.7 GB/s+71% | 320 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+140% | 160-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6700). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700).
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN Xp draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 6700's 175W — a 35.3% difference. The Radeon RX 6700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN Xp) vs 550W (Radeon RX 6700). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 175W-30% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 550W-8% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 108.1+44% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN Xp launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon RX 6700 launched at $379 and now averages $300. The TITAN Xp costs 50% less ($150 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 63.1 (Radeon RX 6700) — the TITAN Xp offers 98.1% better value. The Radeon RX 6700 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon RX 6700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199 | $379-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-50% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.0+98% | 63.1 |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 22 |
| Release | April 6 2017 | June 9 2021 |
| Ranking | #87 | #90 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on TITAN Xp and Radeon RX 6700
