
TITAN Xp vs Radeon Pro W6800X

TITAN Xp
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W6800X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W6800X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro W6800X uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon Pro W6800X likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The TITAN Xp lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The TITAN Xp is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro W6800X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The TITAN Xp offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $150 versus $2,799 for the Radeon Pro W6800X, it costs 95% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 1844% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1844%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,799) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of TITAN Xp and Radeon Pro W6800X

TITAN Xp
The TITAN Xp is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 6 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1405 MHz to 1582 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,752 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Radeon Pro W6800X
The Radeon Pro W6800X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2087 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 18,000 points. Launch price was $2,799.
Graphics Performance
The TITAN Xp scores 18,752 and the Radeon Pro W6800X reaches 18,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The TITAN Xp is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro W6800X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (TITAN Xp) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Raw compute: 12.15 TFLOPS (TITAN Xp) vs 16.03 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6800X). Boost clocks: 1582 MHz vs 2087 MHz.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 18,752+4% | 18,000 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 3840 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.15 TFLOPS | 16.03 TFLOPS+32% |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 2087 MHz+32% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 240 | 240 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+87% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The TITAN Xp comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6800X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6800X offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 547.7 GB/s (TITAN Xp) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon Pro W6800X) — a 5.2% advantage for the Radeon Pro W6800X. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (TITAN Xp) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the Radeon Pro W6800X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | 32 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 547.7 GB/s | 576 GB/s+5% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (TITAN Xp) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6800X). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (TITAN Xp) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X).
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The TITAN Xp draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X's 200W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon Pro W6800X is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (TITAN Xp) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6800X). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 200W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W-8% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.0 | 90.0+20% |
Value Analysis
The TITAN Xp launched at $1199 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon Pro W6800X launched at $2799 and now averages $2799. The TITAN Xp costs 94.6% less ($2649 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 125.0 (TITAN Xp) vs 6.4 (Radeon Pro W6800X) — the TITAN Xp offers 1853.1% better value. The Radeon Pro W6800X is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | TITAN Xp | Radeon Pro W6800X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1199-57% | $2799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-95% | $2799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 125.0+1853% | 6.4 |
| Codename | GP102 | Navi 21 |
| Release | April 6 2017 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #87 | #158 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











