UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
VS
GeForce GTX 1650

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) vs GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

2023Core: 450 MHzBoost: 750 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

2019Core: 1485 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 555.8% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N).

InsightUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)GeForce GTX 1650
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-555.8%)
Leading raw performance (+555.8%)
Longevity
Gen. 12 (2021−2023) (10nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) and GeForce GTX 1650

Intel

UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is manufactured by Intel. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Gen. 12 architecture. The core clock ranges from 450 MHz to 750 MHz. It has 24 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,200 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) scores 1,200 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 555.8%. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is built on Gen. 12 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 10 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 24 (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 750 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score
1,200
7,869+556%
Architecture
Gen. 12
Turing
Process Node
10 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
24
896+3633%
Boost Clock
750 MHz
1665 MHz+122%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity
Shared System RAM
4 GB
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
128 GB/s
Bus Width
System
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 133.3% difference. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)GeForce GTX 1650
TDP
15W-80%
75W
Recommended PSU
1W-100%
300W
Power Connector
Integrated
None
Length
229mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
80.0
104.9+31%
💰

Value Analysis

The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) offers Infinity% better value. The UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).

FeatureUHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)GeForce GTX 1650
MSRP
$0-100%
$149
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$75
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
104.9
Codename
Alder Lake Xe
TU117
Release
January 3 2023
April 23 2019
Ranking
#914
#323