UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs vs FirePro W6150M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
Popular choices:
FirePro W6150M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar FirePro W6150M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs uses modern memory architecture. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro W6150M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the FirePro W6150M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.8%) |
| Longevity | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) (10nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and FirePro W6150M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 15 2020. It features the Gen. 11 Ice Lake architecture. The core clock ranges from 350 MHz to 1450 MHz. It has 48 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 28W. Manufactured using 10 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,400 points.
FirePro W6150M
The FirePro W6150M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 12 2015. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1075 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,358 points.
Graphics Performance
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs scores 2,400 and the FirePro W6150M reaches 2,358 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is built on Gen. 11 Ice Lake while the FirePro W6150M uses GCN 2.0, both on 10 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 48 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs 768 (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,400+2% | 2,358 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 48 | 768+1500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro W6150M has 4 GB. The FirePro W6150M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs 12 (FL12_0) (FirePro W6150M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (FL12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs VCE 2.0 (FirePro W6150M). Decoder: Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) vs UVD 4.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs H.264,HEVC (FirePro W6150M).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | Quick Sync (Tiger Lake) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs draws 28W versus the FirePro W6150M's 150W — a 137.1% difference. The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs) vs 350W (FirePro W6150M). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 82mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85 vs 75°C.
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 28W-81% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 82mm |
| Height | 0mm | 105mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 85 | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 85.7+446% | 15.7 |
Value Analysis
The UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs | FirePro W6150M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $20 | — |
| Codename | Tiger Lake Xe | Saturn |
| Release | August 15 2020 | November 12 2015 |
| Ranking | #712 | #646 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs and FirePro W6150M
