VIA Nano U2250
VS
Core i5-10400F

VIA Nano U2250 vs Core i5-10400F

VIA Nano U2250

1 Cores1 Thrd1 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The VIA Nano U2250 is positioned at rank #1119 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar VIA Nano U2250

#1106
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3452%
#1107
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3401%
#1108
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3122%
#1109
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3108%
#1110
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3080%
#1112
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2974%
#1113
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2852%
#1114
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2847%
#1115
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2771%
#1119
VIA Nano U2250
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
100%
#1120
Core i5-560M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
99%
#1121
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
98%
#1122
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1124
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
97%
#1125
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
97%
#1126
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
97%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
97%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
97%
#1129
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
96%
#1130
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
96%
#1131
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
96%
#1132
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F

#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
104%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
102%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
102%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
102%
#96
Core Ultra 5 235T
MSRP: $247|Avg: $247
102%
#97
Ryzen 9 5950X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $350
101%
#98
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $389
101%
#99
Core i5-14400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $199
101%
#100
Core i5-14400
MSRP: $221|Avg: $197
101%
#101
Core i5-13400
MSRP: $221|Avg: $185
101%
#102
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
MSRP: $699|Avg: $486
100%
#103
Core i5-11600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $140
100%
#104
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
100%
#105
Core i9-12900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $322
100%
#106
Ryzen 7 5800XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $219
100%
#107
Core i5-10400F
MSRP: $160|Avg: $102
100%
#108
Core i9-12900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $320
100%
#109
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
100%
#110
Ryzen 5 4600GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $125
100%
#111
Core i5-10500T
MSRP: $226|Avg: $80
99%
#112
Core i5-14600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#113
Core i7-14700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $330
98%
#114
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP: $89|Avg: $52
98%
#115
Core i9-14900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $469
98%
#116
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#117
Core i7-13790F
MSRP: $392|Avg: $350
97%
#118
Core i5-14500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $251
97%
#119
Core i5-11600KF
MSRP: $237|Avg: $157
97%
#120
Ryzen 5 5600XT
MSRP: $192|Avg: $180
97%
#121
Core i5-13600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10400F (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightVIA Nano U2250Core i5-10400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($102)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Isaiah (2009) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The VIA Nano U2250 (2009) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightVIA Nano U2250Core i5-10400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+201%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($10)
⚠️ Higher cost ($102)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of VIA Nano U2250 and Core i5-10400F

VIA Nano U2250

The VIA Nano U2250 is manufactured by VIA. It was released in 1 January 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Isaiah (2009) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 425 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Processing Power

The VIA Nano U2250 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Core i5-10400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i5-10400F has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the VIA Nano U2250 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400F — a 96.6% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400F. The VIA Nano U2250 uses the Isaiah (2009) architecture (65 nm), while the Core i5-10400F uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the VIA Nano U2250 scores 425 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 187.4% lead for the Core i5-10400F. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 150 vs 1,454, a 162.6% lead for the Core i5-10400F that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 150 vs 5,783 (189.9% advantage for the Core i5-10400F).

FeatureVIA Nano U2250Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
6 / 12+500%
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
4.3 GHz+187%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1 MB+300%
256K (per core)
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
Isaiah (2009)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
425
13,029+2966%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
150
1,454+869%
Geekbench 6 Multi
150
5,783+3755%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The VIA Nano U2250 uses the NanoBGA2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the VIA Nano U2250 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400F — the Core i5-10400F supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i5-10400F supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (VIA Nano U2250) vs 2 (Core i5-10400F). PCIe lanes: 1 (VIA Nano U2250) vs 16 (Core i5-10400F) — the Core i5-10400F offers 15 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: VX900 (VIA Nano U2250) and H410,B460,H470,Z490,H510,B560,H570,Z590 (Core i5-10400F).

FeatureVIA Nano U2250Core i5-10400F
Socket
NanoBGA2
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
128 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
1
16+1500%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x (VIA Nano U2250) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: VIA Nano U2250 targets Embedded, Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureVIA Nano U2250Core i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The VIA Nano U2250 launched at $50 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($10 vs $102), the VIA Nano U2250 is $92 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the VIA Nano U2250 delivers 42.5 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 100.1% better value option.

FeatureVIA Nano U2250Core i5-10400F
MSRP
$50-69%
$160
Avg Price (30d)
$10-90%
$102
Performance per Dollar
42.5
127.7+200%
Release Date
2009
2020