Xeon 2.66
VS
Celeron 430

Xeon 2.66 vs Celeron 430

Intel

Xeon 2.66

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2002
VS
Intel

Celeron 430

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 2.66 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Celeron 430 is on rank 1010, so the Celeron 430 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 2.66

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
157442%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
29727%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
26411%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
20403%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
100%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
94%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
52%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
52%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
34%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 430

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
34104%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
32225%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
23398%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7049%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
5583%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
4884%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2798%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2761%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2514%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2514%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2486%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2419%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2385%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2375%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2354%
#1010
Celeron 430
MSRP: $49|Avg: $10
100%
#1011
Athlon X2 BE-2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $80
99%
#1012
Core i7-875K
MSRP: $353|Avg: $175
98%
#1013
Core i5-670
MSRP: $284|Avg: $100
98%
#1014
Core i5-680
MSRP: $294|Avg: $10
97%
#1015
Core 2 Duo E4300
MSRP: $113|Avg: $5
97%
#1017
Core 2 Duo E4500
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
96%
#1019
Core 2 Duo E7600
MSRP: $133|Avg: $50
95%
#1020
Core 2 Duo E8700
MSRP: $256|Avg: $30
95%
#1021
Core i7-3970X
MSRP: $990|Avg: $60
95%
#1022
Core 2 Duo E6550
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
94%
#1023
Phenom X3 8450
MSRP: $145|Avg: $147
92%
#1024
Core i7-3960X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $60
92%
#1025
Celeron 2.70
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($10) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 2.66 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 2.66Celeron 430
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Prestonia (2002) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 430 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, 0% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 2.66Celeron 430
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 2.66 and Celeron 430

Intel

Xeon 2.66

The Xeon 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Prestonia (2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron 430

The Celeron 430 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 448 points. Launch price was $50.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon 2.66 and Celeron 430 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Xeon 2.66 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 430 — a 38.6% clock advantage for the Xeon 2.66. The Xeon 2.66 uses the Prestonia (2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 430 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 2.66 scores 445 against the Celeron 430's 448 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron 430. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 430
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+48%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
Prestonia (2002)
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
PassMark
445
448
Geekbench 6 Single
226
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 2.66 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 430 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 430
Socket
PGA604
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 2.66) / No (Celeron 430). Primary use case: Celeron 430 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 430 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 430
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 2.66 launched at $337 MSRP, while the Celeron 430 debuted at $49. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron 430 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 2.66 delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Celeron 430 — making the Celeron 430 the 0.7% better value option.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 430
MSRP
$337
$49-85%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
44.5
44.8
Release Date
2002
2007