Xeon 2.66
VS
Celeron 440

Xeon 2.66 vs Celeron 440

Intel

Xeon 2.66

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2002
VS
Intel

Celeron 440

1 Cores1 Thrd35 WWMax: 2 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 2.66 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Celeron 440 is on rank 1031, so the Xeon 2.66 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 2.66

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
157442%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
29727%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
26411%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
20403%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
100%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
94%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
52%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
52%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
34%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 440

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38964%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36818%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26733%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
8053%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6379%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5581%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3196%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3155%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2872%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2872%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2840%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2763%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2725%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2714%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2689%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
96%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
100%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
97%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
97%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
95%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
95%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
95%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
95%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
95%
#1040
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
94%
#1041
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
94%
#1043
Phenom X3 8750
MSRP: $195|Avg: $20
93%
#1044
Pentium G4400TE
MSRP: $300|Avg: $250
91%
#1045
Celeron 2.60
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
91%
#1046
Core i7-990X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $225
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($10) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 2.66 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 2.66Celeron 440
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Prestonia (2002) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe-L (2007−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Celeron 440 ($10), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, 0% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 2.66Celeron 440
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+6%)
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 2.66 and Celeron 440

Intel

Xeon 2.66

The Xeon 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Prestonia (2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Celeron 440

The Celeron 440 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2007 (18 years ago). It is based on the Conroe-L (2007−2008) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 472 points. Launch price was $40.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon 2.66 and Celeron 440 share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Xeon 2.66 versus 2 GHz on the Celeron 440 — a 28.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 2.66. The Xeon 2.66 uses the Prestonia (2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Celeron 440 uses Conroe-L (2007−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 2.66 scores 445 against the Celeron 440's 472 — a 5.9% lead for the Celeron 440. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 440
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+33%
2 GHz
Base Clock
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB
512 kB
Process
130 nm
65 nm-50%
Architecture
Prestonia (2002)
Conroe-L (2007−2008)
PassMark
445
472+6%
Geekbench 6 Single
244
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 2.66 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 440 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 440
Socket
PGA604
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon 2.66) / No (Celeron 440). Primary use case: Celeron 440 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 440 rivals Pentium 4 2.80.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 440
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon 2.66 launched at $337 MSRP, while the Celeron 440 debuted at $59. At current prices ($10 vs $10), the Celeron 440 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 2.66 delivers 44.5 pts/$ vs 47.2 pts/$ for the Celeron 440 — making the Celeron 440 the 5.9% better value option.

FeatureXeon 2.66Celeron 440
MSRP
$337
$59-82%
Avg Price (30d)
$10
$10
Performance per Dollar
44.5
47.2+6%
Release Date
2002
2007