Xeon 2.66
VS
Sempron 3500+

Xeon 2.66 vs Sempron 3500+

Intel

Xeon 2.66

1 Cores1 Thrd89 WWMax: 2.66 GHz2002
VS
AMD

Sempron 3500+

1 Cores1 Thrd62 WWMax: 2 GHz2005

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon 2.66 is positioned at rank 1028 and the Sempron 3500+ is on rank 894, so the Sempron 3500+ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon 2.66

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
157442%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
29727%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
26411%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
20403%
#1028
Xeon 2.66
MSRP: $337|Avg: $10
100%
#1029
Xeon X5272
MSRP: $1172|Avg: $76
94%
#1030
Xeon Platinum 8260L
MSRP: $7500|Avg: $750
52%
#1031
Xeon 3.20
MSRP: $851|Avg: $10
52%
#1032
Xeon X5355
MSRP: $4491|Avg: $4000
34%
#1033
Xeon E5420
MSRP: $7214|Avg: $6500
21%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Sempron 3500+

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20111%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19003%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13797%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4157%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3292%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2880%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1650%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1628%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1482%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1482%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1466%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1426%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1406%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1401%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1388%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
96%
#894
Sempron 3500+
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
99%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
99%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
99%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
99%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
95%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
95%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
94%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
94%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
93%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($10) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon 2.66 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon 2.66Sempron 3500+
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Prestonia (2002) / 130 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Palermo (2001−2005) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Sempron 3500+ ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($10 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon 2.66Sempron 3500+
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 2.66 and Sempron 3500+

Intel

Xeon 2.66

The Xeon 2.66 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Prestonia (2002) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 130 nm process technology. Socket: PGA604. Thermal design power (TDP): 89 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 445 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

Sempron 3500+

The Sempron 3500+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2005 (20 years ago). It is based on the Palermo (2001−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: 939. Thermal design power (TDP): 62 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 465 points. Launch price was $167.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon 2.66 and Sempron 3500+ share an identical 1-core/1-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.66 GHz on the Xeon 2.66 versus 2 GHz on the Sempron 3500+ — a 28.3% clock advantage for the Xeon 2.66. The Xeon 2.66 uses the Prestonia (2002) architecture (130 nm), while the Sempron 3500+ uses Palermo (2001−2005) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 2.66 scores 445 against the Sempron 3500+'s 465 — a 4.4% lead for the Sempron 3500+. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureXeon 2.66Sempron 3500+
Cores / Threads
1 / 1
1 / 1
Boost Clock
2.66 GHz+33%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB+100%
256 kB
Process
130 nm
90 nm-31%
Architecture
Prestonia (2002)
Palermo (2001−2005)
PassMark
445
465+4%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 2.66 uses the PGA604 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Sempron 3500+ uses 939 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon 2.66Sempron 3500+
Socket
PGA604
939
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0