
Xeon 6325P
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2733NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Xeon 6325P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 80W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6325P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,206 vs 16,346).
- ❌45.5% higher power demand at 80W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6325P
2025Xeon D-2733NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 80W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.
Why buy it
- ✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $281 MSRP, while Xeon D-2733NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6325P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (16,206 vs 16,346).
- ❌45.5% higher power demand at 80W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Xeon 6325P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6325P better than Xeon D-2733NT?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Xeon 6325P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 257 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 194 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 167 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 230 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 189 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 135 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 159 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 133 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 102 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Xeon 6325P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 270 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 207 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 273 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 233 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 215 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 87 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 178 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 153 FPS | 81 FPS |
| ultra | 125 FPS | 63 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Xeon 6325P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 394 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 344 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 321 FPS |
| high | 371 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 312 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Xeon 6325P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| medium | 409 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 409 FPS | 361 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 312 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6325P and Xeon D-2733NT

Xeon 6325P
Xeon 6325P
The Xeon 6325P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 16,346 points. Launch price was $281.

Xeon D-2733NT
Xeon D-2733NT
The Xeon D-2733NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 16,206 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6325P packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-2733NT offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon D-2733NT has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.8 GHz on the Xeon 6325P versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon D-2733NT — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon 6325P (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon 6325P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6325P scores 16,346 against the Xeon D-2733NT's 16,206 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon 6325P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Xeon 6325P vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2733NT.
| Feature | Xeon 6325P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.8 GHz+50% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz+67% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 15 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 16,346 | 16,206 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6325P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2733NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon 6325P | Xeon D-2733NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












