PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6369P vs Xeon D-2795NT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6369P vs Xeon D-2795NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6369P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +18.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 110W, a 15W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of FCBGA2579 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 15,000).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (24 MB vs 30 MB).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon D-2795NT

2022

Why buy it

✅+7.1% higher Cinebench R23 multi-core.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).
✅60% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6369P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌15.8% higher power demand at 110W vs 95W.
❌Older platform position on FCBGA2579 with DDR4, while Xeon 6369P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6369P better than Xeon D-2795NT?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon 6369P is ahead with a 18.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2795NT pulls ahead with 7.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core. Xeon D-2795NT also has the bigger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2795NT is the stronger fit. You are getting 7.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 20 cores and 40 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6369P still makes the most sense overall. Xeon 6369P comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 18.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6369P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2022) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of FCBGA2579. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon 6369P vs Xeon D-2795NT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6369P

The Xeon 6369P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 28,213 points. Launch price was $606.

Xeon D-2795NT

The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6369P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6369P versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 54.1% clock advantage for the Xeon 6369P (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Xeon 6369P is built on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon 6369P scores 28,213 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 15,000 (6.9% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,600 vs 1,962, a 28% lead for the Xeon 6369P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 11,898 (17.3% advantage for the Xeon D-2795NT). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6369P vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.

Feature	Xeon 6369P	Xeon D-2795NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	20 / 40+150%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+74%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+65%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)	30 MB+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	—
Process	Intel 7 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	—
PassMark	28,213	28,463
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	15,000+7%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,600+33%	1,962
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	11,898+19%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6369P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 on the Xeon 6369P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT — the Xeon 6369P supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon 6369P) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon 6369P) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,C740 (Xeon 6369P) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).

Feature	Xeon 6369P	Xeon D-2795NT
Socket	LGA1700	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	32+60%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon D-2795NT supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6369P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). Primary use case: Xeon 6369P targets Workstation / AI Inference, Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Xeon 6369P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.

Feature	Xeon 6369P	Xeon D-2795NT
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Workstation / AI Inference	Networking / Edge Computing / SoC