PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6369P vs Xeon W-3245M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6369P vs Xeon W-3245M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6369P

2025

Why buy it

✅Draws 95W instead of 205W, a 110W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3245M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 18,500).
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon W-3245M

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅220% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $5,002 MSRP, while Xeon 6369P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌115.8% higher power demand at 205W vs 95W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Xeon 6369P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-3245M better than Xeon 6369P?

Yes. Xeon W-3245M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 32.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, and 1.0% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon W-3245M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 9.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon W-3245M is the stronger fit. You are getting 32.1% better Cinebench R23 multi-core, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-3245M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-3245M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $5,002 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 9.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (5.7 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6369P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019) and a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6369P vs Xeon W-3245M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6369P

The Xeon 6369P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 28,213 points. Launch price was $606.

Xeon W-3245M

The Xeon W-3245M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 22 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 28,494 points. Launch price was $5,002.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6369P packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon W-3245M offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon W-3245M has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6369P versus 4.6 GHz on the Xeon W-3245M — a 16% clock advantage for the Xeon 6369P (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon 6369P uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon W-3245M uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6369P scores 28,213 against the Xeon W-3245M's 28,494 — a 1% lead for the Xeon W-3245M. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 14,000 vs 18,500 (27.7% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,600 vs 1,474, a 55.3% lead for the Xeon 6369P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,000 vs 11,572 (14.6% advantage for the Xeon W-3245M). L3 cache: 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6369P vs 22 MB on the Xeon W-3245M.

Feature	Xeon 6369P	Xeon W-3245M
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.4 GHz+17%	4.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz+3%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	24 MB (total)+9%	22 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	16 MB+700%
Process	Intel 7 nm-50%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	28,213	28,494
Cinebench R23 Multi	14,000	18,500+32%
Geekbench 6 Single	2,600+76%	1,474
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,000	11,572+16%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6369P uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon W-3245M uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 on the Xeon 6369P versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3245M — the Xeon 6369P supports 63.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3245M supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Xeon 6369P) vs 6 (Xeon W-3245M). PCIe lanes: 20 (Xeon 6369P) vs 64 (Xeon W-3245M) — the Xeon W-3245M offers 44 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: W680,C740 (Xeon 6369P) and C621 (Xeon W-3245M).

Feature	Xeon 6369P	Xeon W-3245M
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200+64%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	64+220%

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3245M supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d, EPT virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6369P targets Workstation / AI Inference, Xeon W-3245M targets Professional Workstation / Mac Pro. Direct competitor: Xeon 6369P rivals Core i7-14700K; Xeon W-3245M rivals Xeon Gold 6242.

Feature	Xeon 6369P	Xeon W-3245M
Integrated GPU	No	No
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Workstation / AI Inference	Professional Workstation / Mac Pro