
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Popular choices:

Xeon 6369P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon 6369P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Xeon 6369P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,854).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 7840HS
2023Xeon 6369P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +24.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Xeon 6369P needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 24 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840HS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (14,000 vs 16,854).
- ❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7840HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840HS better than Xeon 6369P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 267 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 235 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 193 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 157 FPS | 153 FPS |
| ultra | 139 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 136 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 105 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 88 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 652 FPS |
| medium | 406 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 347 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 309 FPS | 424 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 432 FPS | 564 FPS |
| medium | 374 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 272 FPS | 365 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 285 FPS | 329 FPS |
| medium | 258 FPS | 299 FPS |
| high | 242 FPS | 284 FPS |
| ultra | 208 FPS | 250 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 646 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 624 FPS | 404 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 646 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 545 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 467 FPS | 369 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 544 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 475 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 422 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 357 FPS | 285 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 705 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 713 FPS | 705 FPS |
| ultra | 713 FPS | 663 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 713 FPS | 705 FPS |
| medium | 713 FPS | 705 FPS |
| high | 658 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 573 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 544 FPS |
| medium | 511 FPS | 496 FPS |
| high | 456 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 394 FPS | 389 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 7840HS and Xeon 6369P


Ryzen 7 7840HS
Ryzen 7 7840HS
The Ryzen 7 7840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 28,538 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon 6369P
Xeon 6369P
The Xeon 6369P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 28,213 points. Launch price was $606.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 7840HS and Xeon 6369P share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840HS versus 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6369P — a 5.7% clock advantage for the Xeon 6369P (base: 3.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6369P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 7840HS scores 28,538 against the Xeon 6369P's 28,213 — a 1.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840HS. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 16,854 vs 14,000 (18.5% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,962 vs 2,600, a 28% lead for the Xeon 6369P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 11,898 vs 10,000 (17.3% advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840HS). L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840HS vs 24 MB (total) on the Xeon 6369P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+15% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 28,538+1% | 28,213 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 16,854+20% | 14,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,962 | 2,600+33% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 11,898+19% | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 7840HS uses the FP8 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6369P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 7840HS supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 20 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: FP7,FP7r2,FP8 (Ryzen 7 7840HS) and W680,C740 (Xeon 6369P).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP8 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | LPDDR5-7500 / DDR5-5600 | DDR5-4800 / DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB+100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Ryzen 7 7840HS supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen 7 7840HS) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon 6369P). The Ryzen 7 7840HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Xeon 6369P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7840HS targets High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC, Xeon 6369P targets Workstation / AI Inference. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 7840HS rivals Core i7-13700H; Xeon 6369P rivals Core i7-14700K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 7840HS | Xeon 6369P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon 780M | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V, SVM | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | High-performance Laptop / Mini-PC | Workstation / AI Inference |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












