
Xeon 6520P vs EPYC 75F3

Xeon 6520P

EPYC 75F3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6520P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 75F3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Milan (2021−2023) / 7 nm+) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+114%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($2,799) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6520P and EPYC 75F3

Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.

EPYC 75F3
The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 75F3 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 75F3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.95 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 75F3 uses Milan (2021−2023) (7 nm+). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the EPYC 75F3's 64,505 — a 0.8% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.95 GHz+23% |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total) | 256 MB (total)+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+300% | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-57% | 7 nm+ |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Milan (2021−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,010 | 64,505 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 75F3 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus 3200 on the EPYC 75F3 — the EPYC 75F3 supports 199.4% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 128 (EPYC 75F3) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and SP3 (EPYC 75F3).
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 3200+63900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 8 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon 6520P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6520P launched at $1295 MSRP, while the EPYC 75F3 debuted at $5383. At current prices ($1295 vs $2799), the Xeon 6520P is $1504 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 23.0 pts/$ for the EPYC 75F3 — making the Xeon 6520P the 72.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 75F3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1295-76% | $5383 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1295-54% | $2799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+115% | 23.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













