Xeon 6520P vs EPYC 9175F
Xeon 6520P
EPYC 9175F
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6520P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9175F
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Turin (2024) / 4 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+178%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($3,703) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6520P and EPYC 9175F
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.
EPYC 9175F
The EPYC 9175F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 October 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Turin (2024) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 512 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 320 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 65,894 points. Launch price was $4,256.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9175F offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6520P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 5 GHz on the EPYC 9175F — a 22.2% clock advantage for the EPYC 9175F (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 9175F uses Turin (2024) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the EPYC 9175F's 65,894 — a 2.9% lead for the EPYC 9175F. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 512 MB (total) on the EPYC 9175F.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48+50% | 16 / 32 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz | 5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 4.2 GHz+75% |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total) | 512 MB (total)+256% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-25% | 4 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Turin (2024) |
| PassMark | 64,010 | 65,894+3% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9175F uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus 6400 on the EPYC 9175F — the EPYC 9175F supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9175F supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6520P) vs 12 (EPYC 9175F). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 128 (EPYC 9175F) — the EPYC 9175F offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and SP5 (EPYC 9175F).
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 6400+127900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+104857500% | 4096 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; EPYC 9175F rivals Xeon 6972P.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6520P launched at $1295 MSRP, while the EPYC 9175F debuted at $4256. At current prices ($1295 vs $3703), the Xeon 6520P is $2408 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the EPYC 9175F — making the Xeon 6520P the 94.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9175F |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1295-70% | $4256 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1295-65% | $3703 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+178% | 17.8 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6520P and EPYC 9175F
