Xeon 6520P vs EPYC 9334
Xeon 6520P
EPYC 9334
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6520P
Performance Per Dollar EPYC 9334
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,810) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) | ✨ Modern (Genoa (2022−2023) / 5 nm, 6 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+36%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,810) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon 6520P and EPYC 9334
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.
EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.
Processing Power
The Xeon 6520P packs 24 cores / 48 threads, while the EPYC 9334 offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 9334 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P versus 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 — a 2.5% clock advantage for the Xeon 6520P (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon 6520P uses the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the EPYC 9334 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6520P scores 64,010 against the EPYC 9334's 65,568 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 24 / 48 | 32 / 64+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+3% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.4 GHz | 2.7 GHz+13% |
| L3 Cache | 144 MB (total)+13% | 128 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core)+100% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 3 nm-40% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,010 | 65,568+2% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 25,000 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon 6520P uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 9334 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P versus 4800 on the EPYC 9334 — the EPYC 9334 supports 199.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 of RAM compared to 4 TB — 199.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (Xeon 6520P) vs 12 (EPYC 9334). PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6520P) vs 128 (EPYC 9334) — the EPYC 9334 offers 40 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P) and SP5 (EPYC 9334).
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA4710 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0 | PCIe 5.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-6400 | 4800+95900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 TB+69904967% | 6144 |
| RAM Channels | 8 | 12+50% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 88 | 128+45% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254; EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Server | — |
Value Analysis
The Xeon 6520P launched at $1295 MSRP, while the EPYC 9334 debuted at $2990. At current prices ($1295 vs $1810), the Xeon 6520P is $515 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6520P delivers 49.4 pts/$ vs 36.2 pts/$ for the EPYC 9334 — making the Xeon 6520P the 30.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon 6520P | EPYC 9334 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1295-57% | $2990 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $1295-28% | $1810 |
| Performance per Dollar | 49.4+36% | 36.2 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon 6520P and EPYC 9334
