PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon 6710E vs Xeon Platinum 8380 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon 6710E vs Xeon Platinum 8380: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon 6710E

2024

Why buy it

✅+60% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 60 MB).
✅Costs $445 less on MSRP ($1,565 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Delivers 26.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.2 vs 31.0 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $2,010 MSRP).
✅Draws 205W instead of 270W, a 65W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA4189 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8380 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,400 vs 40,000).

Xeon Platinum 8380

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (60 MB vs 96 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($2,010 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
❌31.7% higher power demand at 270W vs 205W.
❌Older platform position on LGA4189 with DDR4, while Xeon 6710E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon Platinum 8380 better than Xeon 6710E?

Yes. Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 284.6% better Geekbench multi-core, and 1.5% higher PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon Platinum 8380 is the stronger fit. You are getting 284.6% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 40 cores and 80 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon Platinum 8380 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon 6710E is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon Platinum 8380 comes in 28.4% more expensive on MSRP at $2,010 MSRP versus $1,565 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon 6710E is also 26.6% better value on MSRP (39.2 vs 31.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6710E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of LGA4189, and 60% larger total L3 cache (96 MB vs 60 MB). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon 6710E vs Xeon Platinum 8380 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon 6710E

The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.

Xeon Platinum 8380

The Xeon Platinum 8380 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2021-04-06. It is based on the Ice Lake-SP (2021) architecture. It features 40 cores and 80 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 60 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4189. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 62,318 points. Launch price was $5,846.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon 6710E packs 64 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 offers 40 cores / 80 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon 6710E uses the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture (Intel 3 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses Ice Lake-SP (2021) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon 6710E scores 61,404 against the Xeon Platinum 8380's 62,318 — a 1.5% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,225 vs 1,300, a 5.9% lead for the Xeon Platinum 8380 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 10,400 vs 40,000 (117.5% advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8380). L3 cache: 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E vs 60 MB (total) on the Xeon Platinum 8380.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Platinum 8380
Cores / Threads	64 / 64+60%	40 / 80
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+6%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+4%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	96 MB (total)+60%	60 MB (total)
L2 Cache	4 MB (per module)+300%	1 MB (per core)
Process	Intel 3 nm-70%	10 nm
Architecture	Sierra Forest (2024)	Ice Lake-SP (2021)
PassMark	61,404	62,318+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,225	1,300+6%
Geekbench 6 Multi	10,400	40,000+285%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon 6710E uses the LGA4710 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon Platinum 8380 uses LGA4189 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E versus DDR4-3200 on the Xeon Platinum 8380 — the Xeon 6710E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Platinum 8380 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 4096 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 8-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 88 (Xeon 6710E) vs 64 (Xeon Platinum 8380) — the Xeon 6710E offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C741 (Xeon 6710E) and C621A (Xeon Platinum 8380).

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Platinum 8380
Socket	LGA4710	LGA4189
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+75%	DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity	4096 GB	6144 GB+50%
RAM Channels	8	8
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	88+38%	64

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server, Xeon Platinum 8380 targets Datacenter. Direct competitor: Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534; Xeon Platinum 8380 rivals EPYC 7543.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Platinum 8380
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	None
Unlocked	No	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	High Efficiency Server	Datacenter

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon 6710E was priced at $1565, while the Xeon Platinum 8380 came in at $2010. On launch pricing ($1565 vs $2010), Xeon 6710E was $445 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon 6710E delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 31.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Platinum 8380 — making the Xeon 6710E the 23.4% better value option.

Feature	Xeon 6710E	Xeon Platinum 8380
MSRP	$1565-22%	$2010
Performance per Dollar	39.2+26%	31.0
Release Date	2024	2021

Search Xeon 6710E on Amazon

Search Xeon Platinum 8380 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.