Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Xeon 6710E
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon 6710E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon 6710E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon 6710E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +54.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 96 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $1,565 MSRP).
- ❌36.6% higher power demand at 280W vs 205W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6710E moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6710E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,926 less on MSRP ($1,565 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 179.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 39.2 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($1,565 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 280W, a 75W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
- ✅37.5% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (10,400 vs 13,739).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (96 MB vs 128 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 3970X better than Xeon 6710E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs Xeon 6710E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Xeon 6710E
The Xeon 6710E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sierra Forest (2024) architecture. It features 64 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 96 MB (total). L2 cache: 4 MB (per module). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 61,404 points. Launch price was $2,749.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6710E offers 64 cores / 64 threads — the Xeon 6710E has 32 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon 6710E — a 33.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6710E uses Sierra Forest (2024) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the Xeon 6710E's 61,404 — a 2.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,664 vs 1,225, a 30.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,739 vs 10,400 (27.7% advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs 96 MB (total) on the Xeon 6710E.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 64 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+41% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+54% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB+33% | 96 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+12700% | 4 MB (per module) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Sierra Forest (2024) |
| PassMark | 62,946+3% | 61,404 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,664+36% | 1,225 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,739+32% | 10,400 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6710E uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus DDR5-5600 on the Xeon 6710E — the Xeon 6710E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6710E supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 8 (Xeon 6710E). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 88 (Xeon 6710E) — the Xeon 6710E offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and C741 (Xeon 6710E).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+75% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4096 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 88+38% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6710E supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6710E). Primary use case: Xeon 6710E targets High Efficiency Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon 6710E rivals EPYC 9534.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | High Efficiency Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X was priced at $4491, while the Xeon 6710E came in at $1565. On launch pricing ($4491 vs $1565), Xeon 6710E was $2926 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 39.2 pts/$ for the Xeon 6710E — making the Xeon 6710E the 94.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6710E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491 | $1565-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 39.2+180% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon 6710E
