EPYC 4565P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
EPYC 4565P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4565P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4565P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4565P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+1.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,761 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 67.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 280W, a 110W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +18.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,946 vs 64,068).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ❌64.7% higher power demand at 280W vs 170W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 4565P moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4565P better than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4565P vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4565P
The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 23.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 1.8% lead for the EPYC 4565P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 32 / 64+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+27% | 4.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+16% | 3.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 4 nm-43% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 64,068+2% | 62,946 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 44,510 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,664 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,739 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — the EPYC 4565P supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 33.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 256 GB+33% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 64+129% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the EPYC 4565P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $4491), EPYC 4565P was $1761 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — making the EPYC 4565P the 50.4% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730-39% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5+68% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4565P and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
