EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w9-3475X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4565P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w9-3475X

36 Cores72 Thrd300 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2023

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w9-3475X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4565P

16 / 32

64,068

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w9-3475X

36 / 72

65,077

+1.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w9-3475X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w9-3475X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4565P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,009 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Delivers 34.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 17.4 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,739 MSRP).
✅Draws 170W instead of 300W, a 130W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon w9-3475X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,068 vs 65,077).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 83 MB).

Xeon w9-3475X

2023

Why buy it

✅+1.6% higher PassMark.
✅+28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).
✅300% more PCIe lanes (112 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.4 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($3,739 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
❌76.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4565P better than Xeon w9-3475X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4565P is ahead with a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X pulls ahead with 1.6% better PassMark. Xeon w9-3475X also has the bigger cache pool with 28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w9-3475X is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 36 cores and 72 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 28.9% larger total L3 cache (83 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4565P is the better buy right now. EPYC 4565P comes in $1,009 cheaper on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $3,739 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w9-3475X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1.6% better PassMark. It is also 34.8% better value on MSRP (23.5 vs 17.4 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4565P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2023). That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w9-3475X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4565P

The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon w9-3475X

The Xeon w9-3475X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 February 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 36 cores and 72 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 82.5 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 300 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,077 points. Launch price was $3,739.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w9-3475X offers 36 cores / 72 threads — the Xeon w9-3475X has 20 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w9-3475X — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Xeon w9-3475X's 65,077 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon w9-3475X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 82.5 MB on the Xeon w9-3475X.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w9-3475X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	36 / 72+125%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+19%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+95%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	82.5 MB+29%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	64,068	65,077+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,814
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	44,869

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w9-3475X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w9-3475X — the EPYC 4565P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w9-3475X supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 8 (Xeon w9-3475X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 112 (Xeon w9-3475X) — the Xeon w9-3475X offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and W790 (Xeon w9-3475X).

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w9-3475X
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	4096 GB+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	112+300%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs true (Xeon w9-3475X). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w9-3475X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon w9-3475X rivals Threadripper PRO 7965WX.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w9-3475X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the Xeon w9-3475X came in at $3739. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $3739), EPYC 4565P was $1009 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 17.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w9-3475X — making the EPYC 4565P the 29.7% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w9-3475X
MSRP	$2730-27%	$3739
Performance per Dollar	23.5+35%	17.4
Release Date	2025	2023

Search EPYC 4565P on Amazon

Search Xeon w9-3475X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.