EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w7-2595X

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4565P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon w7-2595X

26 Cores52 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.8 GHz2024

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w7-2595X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4565P

16 / 32

64,068

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon w7-2595X

26 / 52

66,049

+3.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w7-2595X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w7-2595X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4565P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+31.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 49 MB).
✅Draws 170W instead of 250W, a 80W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon w7-2595X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,068 vs 66,049).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 32.4 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $2,039 MSRP).

Xeon w7-2595X

2024

Why buy it

✅+3.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $691 less on MSRP ($2,039 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
✅Delivers 38.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 32.4 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($2,039 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
✅128.6% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (49 MB vs 64 MB).
❌47.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4565P better than Xeon w7-2595X?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4565P is ahead with a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2595X pulls ahead with 3.1% better PassMark. EPYC 4565P also has the bigger cache pool with 31.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 49 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon w7-2595X is the stronger fit. You are getting 3.1% better PassMark, backed by 26 cores and 52 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4565P is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon w7-2595X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 4565P comes in 33.9% more expensive on MSRP at $2,730 MSRP versus $2,039 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon w7-2595X is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 3.1% better PassMark. Xeon w7-2595X is also 38.0% better value on MSRP (32.4 vs 23.5 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4565P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2024) and 31.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 49 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon w7-2595X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4565P

The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon w7-2595X

The Xeon w7-2595X is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 26 cores and 52 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 48.75 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 66,049 points. Launch price was $2,039.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon w7-2595X offers 26 cores / 52 threads — the Xeon w7-2595X has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 4.8 GHz on the Xeon w7-2595X — a 17.1% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Xeon w7-2595X's 66,049 — a 3% lead for the Xeon w7-2595X. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 48.75 MB on the Xeon w7-2595X.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w7-2595X
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	26 / 52+63%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+19%	4.8 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+54%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)+31%	48.75 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm-43%	Intel 7 nm
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	64,068	66,049+3%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	48,442
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,436
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	21,758

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon w7-2595X uses LGA4677 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus DDR5-4800 on the Xeon w7-2595X — the EPYC 4565P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon w7-2595X supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 966.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 4 (Xeon w7-2595X). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 64 (Xeon w7-2595X) — the Xeon w7-2595X offers 36 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and W790 (Xeon w7-2595X).

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w7-2595X
Socket	AM5	LGA4677
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600+17%	DDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	2048 GB+967%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	64+129%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs true (Xeon w7-2595X). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon w7-2595X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon w7-2595X rivals Ryzen 9 9950X.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w7-2595X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	true

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the Xeon w7-2595X came in at $2039. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $2039), Xeon w7-2595X was $691 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 32.4 pts/$ for the Xeon w7-2595X — making the Xeon w7-2595X the 32% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon w7-2595X
MSRP	$2730	$2039-25%
Performance per Dollar	23.5	32.4+38%
Release Date	2025	2024

Search EPYC 4565P on Amazon

Search Xeon w7-2595X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.