EPYC 4565P vs Xeon 6521P

CPU

GPU

EPYC 4565P

16 Cores32 Thrd170 WWMax: 5.7 GHz2025

EPYC family

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon 6521P

24 Cores48 Thrd225 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2025

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon 6521P Performance Spectrum

EPYC 4565P

16 / 32

64,068

0.0%

Ryzen 7 7700X

Ryzen 7 8840HX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

Xeon 6521P

24 / 48

64,761

+1.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon 6521P FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon 6521P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 4565P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +22.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 170W instead of 225W, a 55W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while Xeon 6521P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (64,068 vs 64,761).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 144 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 23.5 vs 51.8 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $1,250 MSRP).

Xeon 6521P

2025

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).
✅Costs $1,480 less on MSRP ($1,250 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
✅Delivers 120.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.8 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($1,250 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
✅385.7% more PCIe lanes (136 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌32.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 170W.
❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6521P better than EPYC 4565P?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, EPYC 4565P is ahead with a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6521P pulls ahead with 1.1% better PassMark. Xeon 6521P also has the bigger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6521P is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6521P is the better buy right now. Xeon 6521P comes in $1,480 cheaper on MSRP at $1,250 MSRP versus $2,730 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that EPYC 4565P is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 22.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 120.8% better value on MSRP (51.8 vs 23.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6521P makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 125% larger total L3 cache (144 MB vs 64 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 16/32. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 4565P vs Xeon 6521P Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

EPYC 4565P

The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.

Xeon 6521P

The Xeon 6521P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 225 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,761 points. Launch price was $1,250.

⚡

Processing Power

The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the Xeon 6521P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Xeon 6521P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6521P — a 32.7% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon 6521P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the Xeon 6521P's 64,761 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon 6521P. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6521P.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon 6521P
Cores / Threads	16 / 32	24 / 48+50%
Boost Clock	5.7 GHz+39%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	4.3 GHz+65%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	64 MB (total)	144 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	2 MB (per core)+100%
Process	4 nm	Intel 3 nm-25%
Architecture	Grado (2025)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	64,068	64,761+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6521P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus 6400 on the Xeon 6521P — the Xeon 6521P supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6521P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 192 — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 8 (Xeon 6521P). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 136 (Xeon 6521P) — the Xeon 6521P offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and C741 (Xeon 6521P).

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon 6521P
Socket	AM5	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	5600	6400+14%
Max RAM Capacity	192	4096+2033%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	28	136+386%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6521P). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon 6521P requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; Xeon 6521P rivals EPYC 9354.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon 6521P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	AMD Radeon Graphics	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	Yes	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the Xeon 6521P came in at $1250. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $1250), Xeon 6521P was $1480 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 51.8 pts/$ for the Xeon 6521P — making the Xeon 6521P the 75.3% better value option.

Feature	EPYC 4565P	Xeon 6521P
MSRP	$2730	$1250-54%
Performance per Dollar	23.5	51.8+120%
Release Date	2025	2025

Search EPYC 4565P on Amazon

Search Xeon 6521P on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.