EPYC 4565P
EPYC 9254
EPYC 4565P vs EPYC 9254 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 4565P vs EPYC 9254 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 4565P vs EPYC 9254: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 4565P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +13.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $1,031 less on MSRP ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 37.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 23.5 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($2,730 MSRP vs $3,761 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 170W instead of 200W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics, while EPYC 9254 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (64,068 vs 64,344).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (64 MB vs 128 MB).
EPYC 9254
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 64 MB).
- ✅357.1% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 28) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4565P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 23.5 PassMark/$ ($3,761 MSRP vs $2,730 MSRP).
- ❌17.6% higher power demand at 200W vs 170W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while EPYC 4565P can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 4565P better than EPYC 9254?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 4565P vs EPYC 9254 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 4565P
The EPYC 4565P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 May 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Grado (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 64,068 points. Launch price was $589.
EPYC 9254
The EPYC 9254 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.15 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 200 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 64,344 points. Launch price was $2,299.
Processing Power
The EPYC 4565P packs 16 cores / 32 threads, while the EPYC 9254 offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the EPYC 9254 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.7 GHz on the EPYC 4565P versus 4.15 GHz on the EPYC 9254 — a 31.5% clock advantage for the EPYC 4565P (base: 4.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The EPYC 4565P uses the Grado (2025) architecture (4 nm), while the EPYC 9254 uses Genoa (2022−2023) (5 nm, 6 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 4565P scores 64,068 against the EPYC 9254's 64,344 — a 0.4% lead for the EPYC 9254. L3 cache: 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 4565P vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9254.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 16 / 32 | 24 / 48+50% |
| Boost Clock | 5.7 GHz+37% | 4.15 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4.3 GHz+48% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 64 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 4 nm-20% | 5 nm, 6 nm |
| Architecture | Grado (2025) | Genoa (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 64,068 | 64,344 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,233 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 18,023 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 4565P uses the AM5 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the EPYC 9254 uses SP5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 5600 on the EPYC 4565P versus DDR5-4800 on the EPYC 9254 — the EPYC 4565P supports 16.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9254 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (EPYC 4565P) vs 12 (EPYC 9254). PCIe lanes: 28 (EPYC 4565P) vs 128 (EPYC 9254) — the EPYC 9254 offers 100 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM5 (EPYC 4565P) and SP5 (EPYC 9254).
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM5 | SP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | 5600+17% | DDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 6144 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 28 | 128+357% |
Advanced Features
Only the EPYC 4565P has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AVX-512 instructions, benefiting scientific computing, AI inference, and encryption workloads. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (EPYC 4565P) vs AMD-V (EPYC 9254). The EPYC 4565P includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics), while the EPYC 9254 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 9254 targets Enterprise Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4565P rivals Core Ultra 9 285K; EPYC 9254 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | AMD Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Enterprise Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 4565P was priced at $2730, while the EPYC 9254 came in at $3761. On launch pricing ($2730 vs $3761), EPYC 4565P was $1031 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 4565P delivers 23.5 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 9254 — making the EPYC 4565P the 31.3% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 4565P | EPYC 9254 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2730-27% | $3761 |
| Performance per Dollar | 23.5+37% | 17.1 |
| Release Date | 2025 | 2022 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 4565P and EPYC 9254
