CPU
GPU
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Xeon 6520P
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Performance Per Dollar Xeon 6520P
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) | ✨ Modern (Granite Rapids (2024−2025) / Intel 3 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+253%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($4,491) | ✅ More affordable ($1,295) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon 6520P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Xeon 6520P
The Xeon 6520P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 144 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 64,010 points. Launch price was $1,295.
Processing Power
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X packs 32 cores / 64 threads, while the Xeon 6520P offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus 4 GHz on the Xeon 6520P — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6520P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X scores 62,946 against the Xeon 6520P's 64,010 — a 1.7% lead for the Xeon 6520P. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,664 vs 1,900, a 13.2% lead for the Xeon 6520P that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 13,739 vs 25,000 (58.1% advantage for the Xeon 6520P). L3 cache: 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X vs 144 MB (total) on the Xeon 6520P.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64+33% | 24 / 48 |
| Boost Clock | 4.5 GHz+13% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.7 GHz+54% | 2.4 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB | 144 MB (total)+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 62,946 | 64,010+2% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 44,510 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,664 | 1,900+14% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 13,739 | 25,000+82% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses the TR4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6520P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6520P — the Xeon 6520P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 8 (Xeon 6520P). PCIe lanes: 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs 88 (Xeon 6520P) — the Xeon 6520P offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) and FCLGA4710 (Xeon 6520P).
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | TR4 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 256 GB | 4 TB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 64 | 88+38% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6520P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) vs VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6520P). Primary use case: Xeon 6520P targets Server. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE; Xeon 6520P rivals EPYC 9254.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | true | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X launched at $4491 MSRP, while the Xeon 6520P debuted at $1295. At current prices ($4491 vs $1295), the Xeon 6520P is $3196 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X delivers 14.0 pts/$ vs 49.4 pts/$ for the Xeon 6520P — making the Xeon 6520P the 111.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | Xeon 6520P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $4491 | $1295-71% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $4491 | $1295-71% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.0 | 49.4+253% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen Threadripper 3970X and Xeon 6520P
