Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

CPUCPUGPUGPU
AMD

EPYC 75F3

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4 GHz2021
EPYC family
·······
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

32 Cores64 Thrd280 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2019
Threadripper family
·
Buy on Amazon

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Performance Spectrum

EPYC 75F3
32 / 64
64,505
+2.5%
brand logoRyzen 7 7700X
brand logoRyzen AI Max PRO 390
brand logoRyzen 9 7900X3D
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
32 / 64
62,946
0.0%
brand logoRyzen AI 9 HX 370
brand logoRyzen AI Max 390
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
brand logoRyzen 9 9955HX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 3990X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper 9960X
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
brand logoRyzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low198 FPS
medium161 FPS
high130 FPS
ultra100 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low270 FPS
medium222 FPS
high183 FPS
ultra131 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low507 FPS
medium443 FPS
high354 FPS
ultra288 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low806 FPS
medium681 FPS
high528 FPS
ultra457 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low948 FPS
medium792 FPS
high734 FPS
ultra657 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low1025 FPS
medium927 FPS
high862 FPS
ultra765 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low1006 FPS
medium908 FPS
high782 FPS
ultra679 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low1325 FPS
medium1015 FPS
high1073 FPS
ultra875 FPS
Among Us

Among Us

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low60 FPS
medium60 FPS
high60 FPS
ultra60 FPS
Apex Legends

Apex Legends

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low300 FPS
medium300 FPS
high300 FPS
ultra300 FPS
ARC Raiders

ARC Raiders

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low300 FPS
medium229 FPS
high207 FPS
ultra186 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low326 FPS
medium247 FPS
high225 FPS
ultra202 FPS
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low250 FPS
medium222 FPS
high175 FPS
ultra141 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low345 FPS
medium306 FPS
high244 FPS
ultra207 FPS
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low323 FPS
medium289 FPS
high268 FPS
ultra231 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low367 FPS
medium327 FPS
high284 FPS
ultra242 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone

Call of Duty: Warzone

1080P
EPYC 75F3
low239 FPS
medium211 FPS
high180 FPS
ultra168 FPS
1080P
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
low286 FPS
medium266 FPS
high224 FPS
ultra210 FPS
Check FPS with Custom Builds

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

EPYC 75F3

2021

Why buy it

  • ✅+2.5% higher PassMark.
  • ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • ✅100% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 64) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.0 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($5,383 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

2019

Why buy it

  • ✅Better for gaming: +47.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ✅Costs $892 less on MSRP ($4,491 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 17.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 14.0 vs 12.0 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $5,383 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (62,946 vs 64,505).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (128 MB vs 256 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 75F3 better than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is ahead with a 47.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 pulls ahead with 2.5% better PassMark. EPYC 75F3 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 75F3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2.5% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
EPYC 75F3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. EPYC 75F3 comes in 19.9% more expensive on MSRP at $5,383 MSRP versus $4,491 MSRP, and it still gives you 2.5% better PassMark. The compromise is that Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 47.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is also 17.0% better value on MSRP (14.0 vs 12.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 75F3 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2021 vs 2019), 100% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 128 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 32/64. That extra cache should keep paying off in CPU-limited games and high-refresh builds.

EPYC 75F3 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

EPYC 75F3

The EPYC 75F3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 March 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Milan (2021−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.95 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm+ process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 64,505 points. Launch price was $4,860.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the EPYC 75F3 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the EPYC 75F3 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 11.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 2.95 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 75F3 uses the Milan (2021−2023) architecture (7 nm+), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 75F3 scores 64,505 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 2.4% lead for the EPYC 75F3. L3 cache: 256 MB (total) on the EPYC 75F3 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.

FeatureEPYC 75F3Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Cores / Threads
32 / 64
32 / 64
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.5 GHz+13%
Base Clock
2.95 GHz
3.7 GHz+25%
L3 Cache
256 MB (total)+100%
128 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512K (per core)
Process
7 nm+
7 nm, 12 nm
Architecture
Milan (2021−2023)
Matisse (2019−2020)
PassMark
64,505+2%
62,946
Cinebench R23 Multi
—
44,510
Geekbench 6 Single
—
1,664
Geekbench 6 Multi
—
13,739
🧠

Memory & Platform

The EPYC 75F3 uses the SP3 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to 3200 memory speed. The EPYC 75F3 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 8 (EPYC 75F3) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 75F3) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the EPYC 75F3 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP3 (EPYC 75F3) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).

FeatureEPYC 75F3Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Socket
SP3
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0
PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed
3200
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
4096 GB+1500%
256 GB
RAM Channels
8+100%
4
ECC Support
Yes
Yes
PCIe Lanes
128+100%
64
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 75F3) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Direct competitor: EPYC 75F3 rivals Xeon Platinum 8380; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.

FeatureEPYC 75F3Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
None
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
true
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the EPYC 75F3 was priced at $5383, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($5383 vs $4491), Ryzen Threadripper 3970X was $892 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 75F3 delivers 12.0 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — making the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X the 15.6% better value option.

FeatureEPYC 75F3Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
MSRP
$5383
$4491-17%
Performance per Dollar
12.0
14.0+17%
Release Date
2021
2019
Search EPYC 75F3 on AmazonSearch Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.