EPYC 9334
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
EPYC 9334 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
EPYC 9334 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
EPYC 9334 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
EPYC 9334
2022Why buy it
- ✅+4.2% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,501 less on MSRP ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 56.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 21.9 vs 14.0 PassMark/$ ($2,990 MSRP vs $4,491 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 210W instead of 280W, a 70W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on SP5 with DDR5 support instead of TR4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +42.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (62,946 vs 65,568).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 21.9 PassMark/$ ($4,491 MSRP vs $2,990 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 280W vs 210W.
- ❌Older platform position on TR4 with DDR4, while EPYC 9334 moves to SP5 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is EPYC 9334 better than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 9334 vs Ryzen Threadripper 3970X Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
EPYC 9334
The EPYC 9334 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm, 6 nm process technology. Socket: SP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 65,568 points. Launch price was $2,990.
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 November 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 62,946 points. Launch price was $1,999.
Processing Power
Both the EPYC 9334 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X share an identical 32-core/64-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the EPYC 9334 versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The EPYC 9334 uses the Genoa (2022−2023) architecture (5 nm, 6 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the EPYC 9334 scores 65,568 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X's 62,946 — a 4.1% lead for the EPYC 9334. L3 cache: 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 9334 vs 128 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 32 / 64 | 32 / 64 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz | 3.7 GHz+37% |
| L3 Cache | 128 MB (total) | 128 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core)+51100% |
| Process | 5 nm, 6 nm-29% | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Genoa (2022−2023) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 65,568+4% | 62,946 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 44,510 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,664 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,739 |
Memory & Platform
The EPYC 9334 uses the SP5 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches 4800 on the EPYC 9334 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — the EPYC 9334 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 9334 supports up to 6144 GB of RAM compared to 256 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 12 (EPYC 9334) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). PCIe lanes: 128 (EPYC 9334) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X) — the EPYC 9334 offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SP5 (EPYC 9334) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X).
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | SP5 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | 4800+50% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 6144 GB+2300% | 256 GB |
| RAM Channels | 12+200% | 4 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 128+100% | 64 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 9334 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (EPYC 9334) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper 3970X). Direct competitor: EPYC 9334 rivals Xeon Platinum 8468; Ryzen Threadripper 3970X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | None |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
Value Analysis
At launch, the EPYC 9334 was priced at $2990, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X came in at $4491. On launch pricing ($2990 vs $4491), EPYC 9334 was $1501 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the EPYC 9334 delivers 21.9 pts/$ vs 14.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X — making the EPYC 9334 the 44% better value option.
| Feature | EPYC 9334 | Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2990-33% | $4491 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.9+56% | 14.0 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on EPYC 9334 and Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
